Submission Text Full Submission Page
This run aims to access the bad ending in Extra Mario Bros as fast as possible. It improves #6774: Baddap1's NES Extra Mario Bros. "bad ending" in 05:26.78 by 146 frames (2.429 seconds). New routes and strategies were used in this run.

About this run

I think Extra Mario Bros is one of the best ROM hacks ever made, so I decided to TAS it. HappyLee is already working on an improved version of the good ending run, so I TASed a bad ending run. As I went on, I saw that Baddap’s run is littered with suboptimal movement and strategies, and most sections had been improved, both in speed and entertainment, at least in my opinion.
A main reason why Baddap’s run was rejected is because of the goal choice. I think that the bad ending should be considered beating the game, since the game states that this is the end. The game allowing you to continue playing after the bad ending is normal, since many games allows you to continue playing after reaching an ending. The invincibility after getting the good ending is just a bonus for getting the good ending. And the true final boss is a part of the different Area 5’s in the good and bad endings. Plus, the RTA community defines Any% as bad ending.
The other reason why Baddap’s run was rejected is the fact that it is very similar to the good ending run. That is not the case in this run. There is a completely new route on the way to the space jump powerup, resulting in differences including:
  • Not corner clipping in Area 1 first room
  • Extra wall clip in Area 1 second room
  • Walljump in Area 1 fifth room
  • Different strategy for clearing the gap in Area 4 second room (this strategy might be faster even with the good ending route)
  • Walljump in Area 4 fourth room

Area-by-area commentary

Area 1

The deaths at the beginning is for gaming over later to warp back to the start of the game while still preserving the space jump powerup. The black screen after each death loads when Mario had passed a certain Y position, so the goal is to get Mario to that position as fast as possible. To do that, you need to die while having the Y subspeed be as low as possible and Mario’s Y position be as low as possible. By precisely manipulating the jump height to save 2 frames on each death, this run’s deaths saves 8 frames over Baddap.
As it turns out, it is faster to not grab the mushroom and not corner clip to activate the on/off block, but just barely. The framerule that this run gets is extremely tight, with 0 frames to spare, and it is probably required to save time with this route.
The second room is particularly precise, since the optimal acceleration at the beginning is only a subpixel away from losing a frame and the framerule. The fifth room is also a very difficult room, and possibly the room that I spent the most time on. Jumping while inside a wall instantly sets Mario’s X speed to 0, which is used here. L+r is used to give fast acceleration in both directions before the walljump, since otherwise, Mario won’t be far enough right to enter the pipe. Walljumping on this block is barely possible and only subpixels away from not being possible. This run exits Area 1 88 frames ahead of Baddap by not collecting the mushroom and other optimizations, but since Baddap’s run wasn’t fully optimized, it is only 59 frames faster than an optimal run using Baddap’s route.

Area 4

I intentionally slowed down by 3 frames in the first room to manipulate RNG for the next room. In the second room, I found that a full jump from the lower section of the ground can clear the wide gap, and it is faster than using a cheep to bounce over it because of Small Mario’s smaller hitbox. The fastest way to get there is by jumping on the narrow strip of flat ground to the left of the pipe, since jumping from the high platform to the left of it can’t reach there. However, the spiky thing that falls in the middle of the pit can sometimes block the path, which is what the slowdown in the previous room was for.
I used a different strategy for clipping into the wall in the third room, saving some time. It involves approaching the wall from its corner, since that allows Mario to go a bit into the wall. It is faster to walljump in the fourth room as Small Mario, again because of his smaller hitbox. The reason why the space jump powerup is collected is because it is required to perform a wrong warp into Area 5 without collecting the otherwise required 5 keys. The fastest way to enter Area 5 from the space jump room is by getting to Area 2 to save progress, then dying to warp back to the start of Area 1, then getting to Area 5 from there. This run exits Area 2 still 88 frames ahead of Baddap, but it is probably possible to save 2 framerules in Area 4 over Baddap as Big Mario, so the Small Mario route only saves 17 frames.

Area 1 (again)

The mushroom is collected for the Bowser fight at the end. It is faster to grab the first powerup instead of the powerup in the fourth room. Because I had unlocked Space Jump, it is now faster to go into the second exit of the first room since I no longer need to corner clip to get there. Arrow blocks gives 64 speed, which is much faster than the maximum running speed of 40, so the arrow blocks were used to speed up the fourth room.
By pushing Mario further right on the screen, the game thinks that entering the final pipe leads to Area 5 based on the screen’s position. However, the row of blocks in the middle of the room is normally not enough to push Mario far enough right. So Space Jump is used to clip slightly into the bottom of the row of blocks, which acts similarly to a bonk. In this run, I used the 16-frame window in which the screen doesn’t scroll after bonking and clipping into the left side of the row of blocks to get further right without doing the Space Jump-only clip many times, saving 42 frames over Baddap.

Area 5

Because of the layout of Area 5 meaning that there is not much to optimize, that I collected the fireflower here for Bowser, and that there is a lot of enemies here, this part is very good for entertainment, and I believe I had done a good job at that. But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t any time improvements in Area 5. 2 frames were saved from Baddap's run waiting at the start of the first room. 4 frames were saved using a faster strategy for the fireflower grab. 1 frame was saved from better optimization in the third room. And finally, 7 frames were saved by doing the Bowser fight faster.
It seems like this Bowser always jump backwards initially no matter when I enter the boss room. So the strategy used here is to get behind Bowser as fast as possible, then spam fireballs and stay very close to him. Spamming fireballs from in front of Bowser is slower because of the very slow deceleration while facing to the right, and Bowser charges at you instead of running away. It is possible to use a single fireball to do double damage, but that is slower because a fireball like that spends a long time in the air, preventing rapid fireball spam.

arkiandruski: Judging.
arkiandruski: As it stands, I could probably reject this movie based on the poll results alone. I feel that would be unfair to the author, though; and there are issues I need to address. On top of that, I feel that the vote is skewed against this run based on the history that comes from the previous submission in this category. At first I was willing to wait for an eventual improved all keys run, but that is taking longer than I thought and I think it would be unfair to wait any longer.
First, whether or not this run completes the game. For this I'm ignoring infinite games and only looking at runs for games that have a defined end. More specifically, games with different endings based on completion.In the previous submission discussion, [3507] SNES Clock Tower by ruadath in 01:53.46 (as opposed to [3525] SNES Clock Tower "best ending" by ruadath in 11:53.77) and [2741] Genesis Sonic 3 & Knuckles by Aglar & marzojr in 26:53.06 (as opposed to [1387] Genesis Sonic 3 & Knuckles "Sonic, 100%" by marzojr in 55:48.80) were used as examples. In this thread [3168] NES Gimmick! by Aglar, Hotarubi & Samsara in 04:24.61 (as opposed to [1546] NES Gimmick! "100%" by Aglar & Hotarubi in 07:44.45) and [4293] PSX Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee by Samtastic in 12:59.96 (as opposed to [4310] PSX Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee "100%" by Samtastic in 1:04:16.17 and [2372] PSX Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee "maximum casualties" by Dooty in 40:00.53) were also mentioned. I personally feel one of the best examples of the movies I've found is [2186] Genesis Rolo to the Rescue by Aqfaq in 09:04.55. That has to be one of the most disappointing endings to a game I've ever seen.
After looking at the endings of all these games, I notice that the endings for all of them are still functionally similar to each other. You can see the good ending to Rolo here. Both Clock Tower endings trigger the credits, as do the Sonic and Gimmick endings. Both ending for Rolo lead to a game over. For Oddworld, you still get that same screen of text assessing your playstyle.
[3173] NES Ghosts 'n Goblins by Arc & Koh1fds in 08:07.55 is a different issue, since the bad end isn't actually functionally similar to a good end. Instead it is a setup for subsequent loops, and thus is more akin to Super Mario Brothers 2nd quest, or the Donkey Kong games, which also end after one playthrough. The ending in this submission is not setting up a new loop.
From everything I've seen, the games that apply to this situation the most are the Castlevania games like those on the GBA. A few of these games featured a normal ending that happened halfway through the game which served as a gate to the real end-game. Based on how the site treats them, even if these endings are still functionally similar, they still aren't treated as real endings by the site, and that's what purpose the end of the run here serves. It acts as a bottleneck checking whether the flags needed to continue were set.
The movie is borderline on whether it can be counted as an ending, but the precedent set by judgements so far say that it doesn't count, and I haven't seen good enough arguments that I feel comfortable breaking precedent.
However, there's another issue that was brought to my attention by another run in the workbench that I find much more compelling in relation to this runs fate, and that is how the site treats game hacks.
As it currently stands, the site requires runs of game hacks to qualify for the Moons tier in order to be published. In order for a branch to be accepted into Moons tier, it needs to differentiate itself from the main branch in a meaningful way. As applies to hacks, that means that the hack needs to be different enough from the base game to be interesting, and that the run shows off what makes the hack unique and worth publishing. If this means picking a goal that better shows off what's interesting in the hack rather than fastest completion, I believe that should be encouraged.
One of the most notable features of Extra Mario Bros is how it introduces Metroidvania and exploration elements into the Super Mario Bros engine. I would like a run of the hack to demonstrate those elements and mechanics to show the audience why they should even care about the hack in the first place.
In light of these reservations and due to low audience support, rejecting for not qualifying for Moons tier.


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15536
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #6933: DaSmileKat's NES Extra Mario Bros. "bad ending" in 05:24.35
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2630)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6435
Location: The land down under.
I think I get the second attempt at submitting this, but the Judge's comments came from this year and clearly outlines why it was rejected. I think honestly this was more suited to being a user movie instead of a submission... but I won't downplay your determination for a second attempt.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
I thought that this is more entertaining, and is more different to the good ending run, and that might be enough for publication.
EZGames69
He/They
Publisher, Reviewer, Expert player (4431)
Joined: 5/29/2017
Posts: 2761
Unfortunately judges do not agree.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't 12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!" Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish [Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
If runs like SMB1 -3 world ending and SML hard mode can be accepted, why not this?
Editor, Reviewer, Skilled player (1352)
Joined: 9/12/2016
Posts: 1646
Location: Italy
Still, if the author considers it more entertaining than the previously rejected one, it still deserves a chance. Lesee what the audience say.
my personal page - my YouTube channel - my GitHub - my Discord: thunderaxe31 <Masterjun> if you look at the "NES" in a weird angle, it actually clearly says "GBA"
Pepper-Color
They/Them
Player (214)
Joined: 1/12/2019
Posts: 66
Location: Thailand, Bangkok, Vibhavadi rangsit 64 Alley
Seriously, rejected.
TheKDX7
He/Him
Player (118)
Joined: 7/9/2011
Posts: 392
Location: Switzerland
Mihoru wrote:
Seriously, rejected.
There's no reason to reject this without being judged
Samsara
She/They
Senior Judge, Site Admin, Expert player (2098)
Joined: 11/13/2006
Posts: 2821
Location: Northern California
Mihoru wrote:
Seriously, rejected.
Stop. Immediately.
TASvideos Admin and acting Senior Judge 💙 Currently unable to dedicate a lot of time to the site, taking care of family. Now infrequently posting on Bluesky
warmCabin wrote:
You shouldn't need a degree in computer science to get into this hobby.
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1551)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1765
Location: Dumpster
Mihoru wrote:
Seriously, rejected.
Moderator Warning: Do not act as judge when you are not judge.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
xxezrabxxx
He/Him
Joined: 7/15/2017
Posts: 199
Location: Kentucky
I'm assuming he is just predicting whether it will be rejected or not.
I like to comment on submissions and look around the site. You have probably seen me before (if you have been around for a while) either on the site, Discord, or any other social media. I recently took up making temporary encodes for new submissions. Also, I never forget to greet Tompa wherever I find him! "when resyncing stuff sucks it's called Resuccing" - EZGames69 “If an emulator stops being accepted to the site it should be called an emuLAMEr” - EZGames69 "oh no discord, everything I say will now be logged forever, sdfsdf, time to hide" - Masterjun "just had to give therapy to a taxi with daddy issues" - psx Current Projects: Mother 3 (75% complete)
Samsara
She/They
Senior Judge, Site Admin, Expert player (2098)
Joined: 11/13/2006
Posts: 2821
Location: Northern California
xxezrabxxx wrote:
I'm assuming he is just predicting whether it will be rejected or not.
Interesting that someone who also speaks for the Judges out of line while not listening to them at all is speaking up in defense here.
TASvideos Admin and acting Senior Judge 💙 Currently unable to dedicate a lot of time to the site, taking care of family. Now infrequently posting on Bluesky
warmCabin wrote:
You shouldn't need a degree in computer science to get into this hobby.
Expert player (2554)
Joined: 12/23/2007
Posts: 829
The quality of the run itself is great. DaSmileKat is a brilliant TASer in my opinion. Yes, my upcoming "good ending" TAS is going to be VERY different than this run. But whether this "bad ending" branch is worthy of publication here? I'm not sure, and I'll leave it to the judges. :)
Recent projects: SMB warpless TAS (2018), SMB warpless walkathon (2019), SMB something never done before (2019), Extra Mario Bros. (best ending) (2020).
Arc
Editor, Experienced player (813)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 534
Location: Arizona
In my personal opinion as someone who is not a judge and does not claim to speak on behalf of the judges, It is an entertaining and well-made movie, but the issue is still whether it is complete. The ruling precedent for this branch is that it does not properly complete the game, and thus it violates the movie rules. The concept of stare decisis, i.e. respecting a previous decision as correct, exists in any community that follows laws or rules in order to ensure that everyone is treated in a fair and consistent manner over time—unless the previous ruling was a demonstrably erroneous interpretation of the rules. But I do not believe that the previous ruling was erroneous. The burden is on the author to provide a strong reason for overturning the previous ruling. I do not see enough of an argument. I believe it is true that a "bad ending" of a game can be published if it is an actual completion (there are plenty of examples on the site), but I believe that this movie should more accurately be called a "failed ending." I feel that it is similar to the Ghosts 'n Goblins failed ending, in which the player defeats the boss on the final level but cannot access the final boss without having the shield and gets a clear message that there is more to do to reach a completion state. "This weapon has not effect" = failed to get shield = failed to beat final boss. "Where is princess?" = failed to get keys = failed to beat final boss. If I were trying to argue that there is a good reason to overturn the previous ruling, (which I am not,) I would point to these 2 movies: [3168] NES Gimmick! by Aglar, Hotarubi & Samsara in 04:24.61 [1546] NES Gimmick! "100%" by Aglar & Hotarubi in 07:44.45 The shorter Gimmick movie doesn't beat the real final boss nor save the girl. But, unlike this submission, it has a clear ending—a textbook "bad ending." It goes to cutscenes and credits. Whereas Ghosts 'n Goblins and Extra Super Mario Bros both want the player to continue playing after the failed ending. One other thing that I think has been overlooked: the author says, "the game states that this is the end," but I don't think that's true, in context. The game initially says "the end," but then an ellipsis (...) appears. An ellipsis used at the end of a statement, when not quoting someone, indicates that the writer is wavering in their belief. The ellipsis signals "wait a minute, something's missing." And so arguably the game itself is saying that this is a failed ending, i.e., "I guess this is the end... wait, is it really? No, I still have to save the princess." This usage is also in stark contrast to the real ending, which definitively states -- THE END --.
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
Quote from the judge's comments in the previous submission: "However, we don't exactly have clear rules on this so admittedly one could argue that under the current rules there is nothing strictly prohibiting this."
Active player (437)
Joined: 4/21/2004
Posts: 3517
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Sorry for being off topic but I just wanted throw a shoutout to Arc. I love him. Yes, bromance to max! No I am not being sarcastic. Just wanted to say he really explains his view really eloquently.
Nitrogenesis wrote:
Guys I come from the DidyKnogRacist communite, and you are all wrong, tihs is the run of the mileniun and everyone who says otherwise dosnt know any bater! I found this run vary ease to masturbate too!!!! Don't fuck with me, I know this game so that mean I'm always right!StupedfackincommunityTASVideoz!!!!!!
Arc wrote:
I enjoyed this movie in which hands firmly gripping a shaft lead to balls deep in multiple holes.
natt wrote:
I don't want to get involved in this discussion, but as a point of fact C# is literally the first goddamn thing on that fucking page you linked did you even fucking read it
Cooljay wrote:
Mayor Haggar and Cody are such nice people for the community. Metro City's hospitals reached an all time new record of incoming patients due to their great efforts :P
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11469
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
DaSmileKat wrote:
Quote from the judge's comments in the previous submission: "However, we don't exactly have clear rules on this so admittedly one could argue that under the current rules there is nothing strictly prohibiting this."
It wasn't a definitive statement if you read the next sentence after that once.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
The next sentence states that Baddap's run wasn't different enough to the good ending run, which isn't the case here.
Reviewer, Active player (286)
Joined: 12/14/2006
Posts: 717
The differences you state in the submission text seem pretty slight, though at least to my eyes.
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
Also, HappyLee had stated that the new good ending run would be more different to this, probably due to a new good ending route.
Reviewer, Active player (286)
Joined: 12/14/2006
Posts: 717
If that's the case, then we should probably wait until the good ending run is finished before passing judgement on this one.
Skilled player (1020)
Joined: 1/9/2011
Posts: 230
The deaths at the beginning set the tone for an unsatisfying run... and at no point am I 'pleasantly surprised' by what happens. Voting No on entertainment.
DaSmileKat wrote:
If runs like SMB1 -3 world ending and SML hard mode can be accepted, why not this?
SMB1 -3 world ending is still part of the original game. But I do agree that it's more of a popularity issue than a real ending. I don't understand your issue with SML Hard Mode. It has a complete ending.
arkiandruski wrote:
... we should probably wait until the good ending run is finished before passing judgement on this one.
Why? It sounds like you're grasping at straws instead of having a solid basis for acceptance.
Editor, Reviewer, Skilled player (1352)
Joined: 9/12/2016
Posts: 1646
Location: Italy
WarHippy wrote:
arkiandruski wrote:
... we should probably wait until the good ending run is finished before passing judgement on this one.
Why? It sounds like you're grasping at straws instead of having a solid basis for acceptance.
Let's not begin arguing on what sounds like what. The judging process should always take in account as many aspects as possible, so if we've learned that a good ending run may be out soon, then it's only natural wanting to wait just a bit for it, in order to have the chance of making some comparisons. Additionally, this is necessary when assessing the entertaining response of the audience, as it's always better to be able to actually see the opinions of the people.
my personal page - my YouTube channel - my GitHub - my Discord: thunderaxe31 <Masterjun> if you look at the "NES" in a weird angle, it actually clearly says "GBA"
Player (241)
Joined: 9/26/2020
Posts: 36
WarHippy wrote:
The deaths at the beginning set the tone for an unsatisfying run... and at no point am I 'pleasantly surprised' by what happens. Voting No on entertainment.
I agree that the deaths are boring, and I can't do anything about it, but I don't see why the rest of the run failed to entertain you, maybe it's just personal opinion.
WarHippy wrote:
DaSmileKat wrote:
If runs like SMB1 -3 world ending and SML hard mode can be accepted, why not this?
SMB1 -3 world ending is still part of the original game. But I do agree that it's more of a popularity issue than a real ending. I don't understand your issue with SML Hard Mode. It has a complete ending.
Actually, I mentioned SML hard mode not because of anything related to an ending, but to show that a run can be published with good enough entertainment and unique content, even though it does violate a TASVideos rule.
Skilled player (1020)
Joined: 1/9/2011
Posts: 230
DaSmileKat wrote:
..., but I don't see why the rest of the run failed to entertain you, maybe it's just personal opinion.
It's pretty par for the course in regards to NES mario bros. Maybe a 'Meh' vote would've been more in line.
ThunderAxe31 wrote:
... if we've learned that a good ending run may be out soon, then it's only natural wanting to wait just a bit for it
I didn't intend for my statement to sound as harsh as it did. The point I was implying was that this movie's acceptance now seems to rely on Happy Lee's updated run in the hopes that it's different enough.