This topic is for the purpose of discussing #1430: Xipo's NES Captain America and the Avengers in 14:51.85

Now that I've seen this improved version, I have to vote yes. This run was fast and entertaining and well done, but I have one question: Wouldn't it be possible to luck manipulate those "traps" from your way on the map? PS. You might want to cancel your old run ;)

Thank you! But I think my movie maybe the best way on the map.It isn't random,but forcible,because I use S/L,sometimes I wait a few frame on purpose.I think I should walk not rush somewhere.

What is it with lazy NES programmers only making one or two BGM tracks? Anyway, this run was well done, but it started to get old after a while. If the game were shorter I'd vote yes, but it goes on and on and is just the same thing. It was pretty good for a while though, so I'll vote "meh".

This movie looked very optimized to me. The game itself is relatively fun, and pretty fast, nothing spectacular though. I'll vote yes on this. I have to admit though, that I tapped the turbo button during some of the boss battles - I found them pretty repetitive.

I did also turbo some parts, but generally it's entertaining enough to get a yes vote.

I watched the movie twice before making a decision. I am concerned that the movie would seem repetitive, even boring, to someone who had never played the game before. This is mostly an issue with the appearant quality of the game itself, although using both of the available characters would certainly have helped greatly. Your tool-assisted gameplay looks rock-solid and very optimized. I think it's good enough to get a YES vote, but using both characters instead of just Captain America would have made the movie a lot more interesting to watch, even if at the expense of some time.

I will vote no. There isn't much interesting going on in this game, and the boss fights are not interesting to watch at all.

I watched this some time ago. I wasn't really impressed by the game. They TASing of it was very high quality though. I just think that there isn't much completixty in game. The character moves either awkwardly or slowly. And there isn't many creative time saving tricks are shortcuts available. I think I will have to vote no based on the game choice. Though someone mentioned using more than 1 character, I don't really know the game well enough to know if that would help.

Though someone mentioned using more than 1 character, I don't really know the game well enough to know if that would help.

It would make the movie more entertaining by adding variety at the expense of time. My yes was a "barely" yes, for the reasons cited by adelikat and Truncated.

I can't vote.But I really think it's a good movie.

>Though someone mentioned using more than 1 character, I don't really know the game well enough to know if that would help. The characters take turns playing. The other character cannot rush (at least I can't make him). So no.

Voted meh. It was entertaining enough to sit through, though I probably wouldn't have if I had known what to expect.

om, nom, nom... blech, stale!

ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT