Deltarune Chapter 1 is an earthbound-esque RPG released in 2018 as a demo for the PC/Mac and later PS4 and Switch. It is the followup to the massively popular Undertale also created by Toby Fox.

Game objectives

  • Emulator used: libtas 1.3.3
  • This was made using JohnWatson78's unofficial Linux port, found here: https://redd.it/9wizh3
  • Played in Japanese to save time
  • Goal: Finish the game in the fastest time possible

Comments

Clean movement is very important for keeping speed in Deltarune. If you hold Shift/X you can run, and after a few seconds this run becomes slightly faster. If you touch a wall/object at any point while running, you are reverted back to walking speed. At all times in the TAS, Kris is constantly running to save the most time possible, even when he must wait for an enemy to clear the path. That being said a lot of the time instead of simply walking in a straight line I'll choose to swerve up and down or alternate directions super quickly. This is just for fun, and doesn't lose any time.
Most overworld encounters in this game function the same way. The enemy has a range in which they can see you, after that they will pause in their tracks for a moment before becoming aggro'd and chasing you. Some enemies chase you at a speed which you can easily outrun (like the Rabbick in the maze) and others you must carefully outrun to escape the battle (like the Head Hathy in Card Castle). Also, some enemies stick to walls, which can be used to your advantage (as in the Rudinn Ranger in Card Castle) while others can pass through any object (again like Head Hathy in Card Castle).
In the battles that are mandatory, often you will want to "graze" by the enemy's attacks to both gain TP and make the turn end faster. Not all attacks can be ended faster by grazing, and I'll be noting when that is or isn't the case.
TP (Tension Points or Toilet Paper) is visible to the left hand side of the screen during battle. It can be used to perform magic attacks/spells with Susie and Ralsei. While all battles except for King don't actually utilize magic, the TP meter is a good indicator of how well you have grazed an attack.
Playing in Japanese saves roughly 13 seconds over English because of how text scrolls. Japanese is more condensed so it saves time in multiple spots, most noticeably for the text that appears while entering Castle Town castle.

Stage by stage comments

Character Creation

At the very beginning of Deltarune, before you actually start the game proper, you need to fill in some information for your character. As in turns out, your choices don't matter, so I simply choose the first option available on every screen. However, for the character/creator naming I typed TAS/TENDOG for fun, costing 18 frames.

Cave

In New Game +, instead of leaving home and heading to school, Kris can simply go back to bed and skip some introductory story. This saves over 3 minutes right off the bat. Before Kris awakens, I mash all arrow keys alternately on/off to get him up and walking as fast as possible. Also, the shiny object that Kris awakens next to in the Dark World is the Wrist Protector, which nearly every speedrun gets because it allows text to be auto-mashed by holding the Ctrl/C button. However, with frame perfect mashing the Wrist Protector does not save any additional time, so the TAS skips picking it up (saving 12 frames). In the first wall puzzle of the game, you have to face up while pressing Enter/Z to activate the button. Because Kris cannot switch from looking left/right to looking up/down without losing his horizontal speed, I entered the room holding both right + a vertical direction, and by switching between walking diagonally right+up and right+down, I can press the buttons on the wall without having to lose any speed. I'll do this in a few other areas of the run, so I'll call it vert-walking from now on. The rest of the cave section is self explanatory.

Castle Town

Once I navigate to the castle I go through some dialogue and fight Lancer. The fastest way to defeat him is with 3 gold attacks from Kris. Also during this fight, I intentionally damage Susie to help speed up the K.Round fight in the Great Board. I graze by Lancer's attacks during this battle, but it doesn't actually save time.

Fields

Here is where we begin to see enemies in the overworld. Kris does not have to slow down or wait to dodge any of the Rudinns in this opening area. Vert-walking is used to press a button as fast as possible in a puzzle. During the mandatory Hathy fight, I use the first turn to X-Flatter all the Hathies to spare them in the next 2 turns. Grazing during this battle saves time, but I intentionally take damage at the end of the first attack to skip some dialogue from Lancer (who talks about how surprised he is at your skill if you don't get hit). In the following turns I first spare one Hathy so that I get another attack which I can graze to save time on, and then spare the other two the next turn. Afterwards Susie rejoins the party and after solving a puzzle (again using vert-walking to press the button) they encounter C.Round. I just want to defeat him as fast as possible, so Kris attacks and hits him with the weakest hit. Next is the Jigsawry fight, in which Kris and Ralsei spare 2 Jigsawries and Susie defeats 1. Susie automatically attacks, otherwise it might have been faster to spare all 3. Before entering the Great Board, a box puzzle is quickly solved utilizing a small text skip in which both boxes are pushed onto their buttons before Ralsei/Susie can say anything. The enemy before entering Great Board actually cannot be rushed past, so while I aggro it as soon as possible, I have to run back and forth to get by it without losing speed.

Great Board

Most of the Great Board is self-explanatory; Kris and the party are constantly running to the right and avoiding touching any walls. Both the Ponmen encounters can be skipped this way. The K.Round fight at the end of Great Board is where Susie's damage taken during the Lancer fight comes in to play. Because Susie can be targeted on the first turn of the fight (which is up to RNG), I can intentionally knock her out. This prevents her from auto-attacking on every turn after the first, saving a total of about 6 seconds.

Forest

There are a couple of Rabbicks at the start of Forest which pop out of bushes when Kris is within a certain range. I have to pause for a moment to safely pass the first one, and walk a bit out of my way to safely pass the second. Some swinging beams are dodged, and then I solve a 3 tile puzzle using vert-walking to keep my momentum throughout. I press some buttons on the puzzle in the next room for fun, but it doesn't need to be solved. The Bloxer in that same room cannot be aggro'd, so I run as close as I can to it to pass it and enter the next room. Again, vert-walking is used to solve a puzzle and then the mandatory Clover fight begins. Using the manual twice and sparing allows me to beat Clover in 2 turns. I also manipulate the RNG to get the "shotgun"-like attack which ends a bit faster with good grazing than the other possible attack. After walking past a bake sale, there is a room with 2 Bloxers. Unfortunately there is no way to aggro them and escape the room without an encounter, so several seconds are spent waiting for the second Bloxer to pass by. In the following room I intentionally take damage in order to pass through the dancers as fast as possible. While building the machine to Thrash Your own Ass, I choose to build the duck not because it is fast but because it is a meme (it actually loses 70 frames to build the duck rather than choose the first options). In the room with the large swinging beam, I use vert-walking to press a hidden button, then continue out into the maze.

Maze

The correct option for every path in the maze is the path that neither Lancer nor Susie go (same every time). At no point do I have to slow down or wait to pass an obstacle, even the Bloxer can be passed by getting very close to before moving diagonally up+right and getting it stuck on a wall. In the Thrashing Room, Kris and Ralsei fight Lancer and Susie. The fastest way to end the battle is to act on Lancer 4 times, however the 4th time must be done during a turn when Susie is asleep/downed. The options are either act L act L act S act L act L or act L act L act L act S act L. The latter is slightly faster because the third turn's attack differs depending on if Susie is awake or not, and by having her awake I get an axe-tossing attack that can be grazed to end faster. Choosing the other pattern would result in an attack that cannot be sped up. Afterwards there is a long dialogue section before I enter a chase sequence to get to Card Castle. I just want to not get hit during it, pretty self-explanatory.

Prison

In the jail cell Kris needs to interact with 3 things before he can talk to Ralsei and progress the story. One of the 3 things I choose to check is the Iron Shackle, which is an equip item I will want later for the King fight. After that there is some dialogue then a fight against Lancer. I can't actually affect the outcome of the battle, but by grazing the first three attacks well some time can be shaved off. The rest of the attacks always dodge you so I just mess around there for fun. After some more dialogue the party leaves and heads up the elevator. I accidentally hit the wall just before entering the elevator and lost 2 frames, but didn't notice until the TAS was complete.

Card Castle

In the very first room of Card Castle, I dodge a Rudinn Ranger by running in a way that lets Kris slip underneath it and get it to stick to the corner. Then Kris runs out of the hallway diagonally and around the next corner before the RR can catch it. In the next room I walk through a beam without taking damage by clipping through it an the right angle. In two rooms of Card Castle we need to make mac n cheese and solve a puzzle by pushing a block onto a button; in both cases the only important thing is that I don't lose speed by touching the box. Head Hathy is an infamously difficult enemy to skip, but by running diagonally and not losing speed Kris can pass it without an encounter. The room afterwards has some dancers that I intentionally dodge, not because they would kill Kris but because it wastes time. I enter the shop before continuing on to buy a Brave Axe, and then immediately equip it as well as the Iron Shackle on to Susie. While it wastes time now to take this detour, it will save more time during the King battle. But before that fight we encounter K.Round again, this time yeeting Ralsei at the crown 3 times to defeat it. The third shot looks a bit higher than the first, this is because the hitboxes are not the same each time.

King

I spent a lot of time deciding what was the fastest way to approach this battle. It is possible to defeat King in 8 turns by getting the Spooky Sword and Ragger earlier in the game, but it costs more time to get those weapons than it is worth. It's possible to beat King without attacking by having everyone defend for 15 turns, however while the team's turns end fast, I have to sit through at least 5 additional King attacks, which ultimately makes that option slow. In the end, the fastest method I found was to defeat King in 10 turns by mainly using Red Buster attacks whenever 60TP is available. This TP is gained through extremely precise grazing, gold hits during the 2 turns where everyone attacks, and from Ralsei defending. One turn has to be spent activating Red Buster, however a Red Buster deals 347 damage compared to 222 from Rude Buster or 263 from everyone on the team attacking together. Additionally, Red Busters are just about as fast as having everyone attack. While I have the option to additionally attack with Ralsei during a Red Buster turn, it adds nearly 3 seconds to the turn length and only for a maximum of 60 damage. King has 2800 damage total. By the end of the 10th attack, 2830 damage has been done.

End

After the fight, there is a lot of dialogue before Kris and Susie leave the Dark World. After leaving the school, I head straight home (admittedly wasting 22 frames to visit Sans) and then the run is complete once Kris chooses to go to bed.

Other comments

Improvements

The only error I know that I made during this TAS was the bump before entering the elevator in Prison. Additionally, the 3 Hathy fight could have been slightly more optimal with a different grazing strategy. Other than that, I don't know how to play this game faster. Perhaps some new strategy for the King fight can be found that could save some time.

Thanks

Thanks to LucasWills for helping me to get libtas working with this game. Thanks JohnWatson78 for providing the Linux port. Thanks rhombu for creating a King fight sheet which I converted into my own version for finding the fastest fight. Thanks BenLubar and greysondn for assisting me with libtas and VirtualBox. Thanks everyone in the Deltarune speedrunning community for their support and help throughout the creation of this TAS.

Masterjun: Judging.
Masterjun: This submission has a few problems.
This game is a demo version of an in-development game. Since having access to an official demo version is relatively recent in the history of TASVideos, there is no real precedent case. We do have rules for prototype versions and for in-development hacks/homebrews, but these are not trivial to apply here. This would require more discussions, but a good overview can be found here.

However, there are more important issues this submission has which need to be addressed:

First, it uses an unofficial Linux port which we simply don't allow for obvious reasons. There seem to be a lot of games where this kind of porting can be applied (Game Maker Studio games), so it's possible it might require some more discussions to possibly create certain exceptions. But for now, it's against the rules.
Second, it starts from a non-clean state. This movie requires you to have a configuration where you already beat the game once. We only allow this if this unlocks certain features otherwise unavailable. This doesn't seem to be the case here so it's not allowed. In any case, we would need a verification movie to even be able to accept a run from a non-clean state.
Third, it intentionally loses time to do unnecessary things. We allow this if it makes up for the time loss in entertainment. But in this case, it only confuses the viewer further and makes the movie feel even less like a TAS.
For these reasons I have to reject this.
Memory: Resetting to new to claim due to updated rules.
Memory: Claiming for rejudgment.
Memory: I don't have it in me at the moment to work on this. Resetting to new.
feos: Updating with a movie that syncs on libTAS 1.4.5.

feos: Claiming for judging.
feos: Thanks to OceanBagel for all the review heavy-lifting in the thread! While I don't understand RPGs, I understand everything else related to this submission.
Rules on the savegame branch have changed indeed, and it's a Standard goal now.
Due to negligible differences from a clean-state completion, it may be possible to obsolete this run in the future with one made from a fresh start, if it contains comparable improvements that are independent from NG+.
If NG+ is discovered to cause visible route changes compared to clean save, they may be kept separate.
In any case, it doesn't sound like there are people interested in TASing this chapter from a clean save anyway.
Rules on game authenticity have been clarified.
We allow changes that make the game TASable in the first place, and in the case of GameMaker ports, actual gameplay is unaffected, as the only thing we change is the launcher, and we take it from a freely available game, so it should remain available. And if it becomes a problem, people will find another donor game I'm sure, because they actually need it to keep working in libTAS.
Rules on game demo versions have been changed.
While we now say that TASes of early demos will be obsoleted by a movie of the full game whenever it's released, but if all the chapters are still freely selectable in the main game, they can be considered individual game modes and have separate branches published.
Now it's been said that items can be carried over across chapters, which makes a movie playing all chapters in one go inherently different in routing from movies of individual chapters, because different things would be optimal in them. An "all chapters" branch may still be accepted separately as a full completion, but we'll see when the time comes.
We always allowed speed/entertainment tradeoffs.
Back in the day it may not be super obvious what kind of tradeoff is acceptable, but to me it's clear that if it was the only issue with this submission even back in 2019, we'd come up with something to make it accepted. Pointing fingers at that aspect of the previous judgment like it's bad to even question it, is missing the point.
Since then we all agreed that the fact of having speed/entertainment tradeoffs does not invalidate the goal of aiming for speed and optimality. But there were times when this was unclear, and I personally advised against it in our Guidelines back in 2013.
But there's a shorter run now?
A huge portion of that new run comes from version differences that enable some new timesaves. If the TAS of this old version was redone, we'd only see an improvement of a few seconds, and it doesn't exist yet (or at least not one that'd be faster).
If this one is published, and the movie of the new version is submitted, it may obsolete it maybe, but we'll need to discuss it separately when that happens. We don't have to do infinite research in advance to predict things for our future selves, because new challenges will appear anyway, and reality may change by then, invalidating our prior solutions. It's not because we're lazy!
All in all, this submission got enough support to accept it now.
feos: Also turned "chapter 1" into a branch label, because the game seems to be offering individual episodes separately so far, and regardless of game version it should still be possible to play them independently.

EZGames69: Processing...


Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
If we had some kind of "demo" category (as has been suggested in the past), this could be published as one...
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2792
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... juicy!
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1558)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1767
Location: Dumpster
Given the recent announcement of Deltarune chapter 2, I think this game is in fact releasing in an episodic format and the label of "Demo" doesn't really apply here. However, the lack of any verification movie file and I believe the unofficial nature of the Linux release (somebody can correct me there) still prevent it from being acceptable.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
Player (61)
Joined: 9/15/2023
Posts: 71
Memory wrote:
Given the recent announcement of Deltarune chapter 2, I think this game is in fact releasing in an episodic format and the label of "Demo" doesn't really apply here. However, the lack of any verification movie file and I believe the unofficial nature of the Linux release (somebody can correct me there) still prevent it from being acceptable.
Reading the Platforms page, unofficial Linux ports of Windows games running under libTAS is now a supported platform configuration as of at least June 2023 (page revision 132)- this might merit revisiting, at least if a verification movie gets made.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
Hello, I would like to request this submission to be rejudged, as I believe it meets the criteria to be accepted and published. There were several points made in the rejection reasons and each of them I believe has been resolved since then. I'll go over each section of the judgement message and why I think it no longer applies.
This game is a demo version of an in-development game...
As Memory pointed out above, Deltarune is scheduled to release in installments: Chapter 1 released as the initial demo, and then chapter 2 released with a largely unchanged chapter 1. The next announced release is chapters 3 and 4 together as a paid release, with a tentatively hinted total of 7 chapters in the full game. However, the rule against demos has since been removed, so this portion of the judgement should no longer apply.
First, it uses an unofficial Linux port...
This technique of porting Gamemaker games to Linux has become more acceptable since this judgement has been written. For example, [4708] Windows Undertale "Genocide ending, minimum confirms" by duuuuude5 in 1:22:29.95 is a published Undertale TAS that uses this technique to be able to TAS the Windows-only initial release of Undertale. The main principle of this self-porting technique is that Gamemaker games isolate the game data into one cross-platform file that is then interpreted by the runner, a generic executable with no game data. By setting up a Linux executable and the (unmodified) game data, the game can be run in a largely equivalent manner on a different platform. So far, this has been the only reliable way to TAS Gamemaker games that don't have Linux releases. Due to this technique being already used in published movies, I would argue that this portion of the judgement has since been addressed and should no longer apply.
Second, it starts from a non-clean state...
This rule has been changed since the initial judgement, as submissions are now allowed to begin from SaveRAM per the movie rules. NG+ is the established standard for the Deltarune speedrunning community which is why it was used in this TAS and continues to be used in other Deltarune TASes.
In any case, we would need a verification movie...
This submission didn't initially have a verification movie to generate the save files for NG+, but I have created one and uploaded it as a userfile: User movie #638402543939765159 (updated to enable Auto-restart game) User movie #638529433636457154. I've confirmed that this submission syncs to the end when run after the verification movie. Due to the movie rules now allowing SaveRAM-anchored movies and the verification movie I created, I believe this portion of the judgement has been addressed as well.
Third, it intentionally loses time to do unnecessary things...
This was a total of 3.6 seconds spread out across three portions of the run, as detailed by tendog in a previous post in this thread on the matter. Each of these was entertaining to fans of the game and members of the speedrunning community and none of them detracted from the reputation of this TAS as the standard of comparison for Deltarune chapter 1 speedruns. Moreover, these three points in the run were isolated and didn't impact any of the routing beyond the immediate small amount of time loss. They could have been removed, but that would only bring down the final time and wouldn't add to the flair of the run. In fact, it would have taken away a fun part of the TAS that people still find entertaining to this day. To say this wasn't well-received is quite the understatement. Multiple communities lost faith in the TASVideos site because of this portion of the judgement, and feelings of distrust continue to this day. It felt like arbitrary gatekeeping to have small but meaningful nods to the game's community being cited as rejection reasons, as if they invalidate the months of work spent optimizing the other 99.8% of the TAS. I believe this portion of the judgement was wrong at the time and is still wrong now. Lastly, it's worth mentioning that this TAS is no longer the fastest Deltarune chapter 1 TAS, as a new TAS was recently completed: Link to video However, the newer TAS uses a version that didn't exist at the time of this submission and I believe this submission should be accepted based on it being the fastest completion at the time of submission and for several years afterwards.
lexikiq
She/Her
Active player (458)
Joined: 8/13/2018
Posts: 109
Location: United States of America
The existence of a more optimized TAS might be a big blocker in getting this published now but I certainly agree that this should be/should've been published. Might be worth mentioning this in the judges/admins thread so it gets more attention? (I think that's a thing...)
Samsara
She/They
Senior Judge, Site Admin, Expert player (2241)
Joined: 11/13/2006
Posts: 2823
Location: Northern California
We're definitely aware (I believe I was the one who suggested OceanBagel post here), the problem is just that the judging team doesn't have much time to dedicate to rejudging runs right now. The workbench has been packed the past couple years and isn't showing signs of slowing down going forward. Thinking about it, there should be room on the site for other alternate forms of judging. Reviewers didn't quite work out how I wanted them to, but I think the idea's still solid enough to rework into a different form of community-based judging. I'll workshop it. Might take a bit of time, but it's definitely a priority for me.
TASvideos Admin and acting Senior Judge 💙 Currently unable to dedicate a lot of time to the site, taking care of family. Now infrequently posting on Bluesky
warmCabin wrote:
You shouldn't need a degree in computer science to get into this hobby.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
lexikiq wrote:
The existence of a more optimized TAS might be a big blocker in getting this published now but I certainly agree that this should be/should've been published.
I don't know what kind of precedent there is for rejudging, but I would hope that the submission time is taken into account during the process when it comes to beating known records. It might usually make sense if a faster TAS is made during judgement to reject the slower one, but I'm not convinced it makes sense to judge a 2019 TAS by comparing it to 2024 speedruns, especially when a large portion of the time save comes from newer versions of the game. I'd like to think TASVideos also functions as something of a historic record of TASes, and this one stood for nearly 5 years. There's also the matter of the new Deltarune chapter 1 TAS possibly not being acceptable on TASVideos. The movie rules currently say that the movie must beat the game, which for the version used in the newer Deltarune chapter 1 TAS would mean completing the game through chapter 2. That's as opposed to tendog's Deltarune chapter 1 TAS, which was done on the old demo that only had chapter 1 in it, thus following this rule. This is a rule that I hope will be changed eventually, but it's still there as of now. It would be a cruel twist of irony for the original chapter 1 TAS to be rejected because of the existence of a newer chapter 1 TAS that was also rejected... Also, I did make an abbreviated post on the "Revisiting rejected submissions..." thread summarizing my above post and linked back to this thread: Post #527379
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1558)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1767
Location: Dumpster
OceanBagel wrote:
There's also the matter of the new Deltarune chapter 1 TAS possibly not being acceptable on TASVideos. The movie rules currently say that the movie must beat the game, which for the version used in the newer Deltarune chapter 1 TAS would mean completing the game through chapter 2. That's as opposed to tendog's Deltarune chapter 1 TAS, which was done on the old demo that only had chapter 1 in it, thus following this rule. This is a rule that I hope will be changed eventually, but it's still there as of now. It would be a cruel twist of irony for the original chapter 1 TAS to be rejected because of the existence of a newer chapter 1 TAS that was also rejected...
Honestly the biggest thing I have questions about: Are the chapters entirely isolated from each other? Or does any sort of progress carry over from chapter 1 to chapter 2? Can you freely select chapter 1 or 2?
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
You're able to freely select either chapter 1 or chapter 2 from the start. You can select chapter 2 without having ever played chapter 1 and it'll give you a default set of equipment (probably to compensate for difficulty scaling). But you are able to carry over progress from one chapter to the next (including items, completion of secret bosses, and completion of alternate routes) and this likely means that some future content will only be available when playing through all the chapters one after another. For speedruns on the chapter 1+2 demo, this mainly affects which equipment you have and how much gold you have. RTA speedruns of chapter 2 on its own require that it's started without chapter 1 data so that you have the default equipment, and that's also how I would expect TASes of chapter 2 to be done. But full game speedruns bring stronger equipment from chapter 1 into chapter 2, which leads to some advantages in chapter 2 over the default equipment. Also, I should mention that NG+ status is tracked per-chapter, so you're able to get the benefits of NG+ in chapter 2 even if you never played chapter 1.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
OceanBagel wrote:
It might usually make sense if a faster TAS is made during judgement to reject the slower one, but I'm not convinced it makes sense to judge a 2019 TAS by comparing it to 2024 speedruns, especially when a large portion of the time save comes from newer versions of the game.
How large is it?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
feos wrote:
OceanBagel wrote:
It might usually make sense if a faster TAS is made during judgement to reject the slower one, but I'm not convinced it makes sense to judge a 2019 TAS by comparing it to 2024 speedruns, especially when a large portion of the time save comes from newer versions of the game.
How large is it?
I timed out the more obvious version differences and it added up to 65 seconds. I know there are also more subtle differences throughout the run that I didn't time out, so the actual portion of the time save that comes from version differences is even higher than 65 seconds. There are several glitches that became possible on later versions but weren't possible on the initial demo, so a lot of the time save comes from skipping minibosses, cutscenes, or entire rooms using these version-exclusive glitches. The new TAS also achieves a different ending (speedrunners call it True Pacifist, it's the "good" ending of the chapter) because the new glitches make it faster than the standard ending.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Thanks. Can you roughly estimate time that could be saved if this run was done today on the same game version it used originally, but using all the new tricks available for that version?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
There are just a few new tricks possible on the original version that weren't known at the time. One is a method of clearing the intro text slightly faster (it's way more complicated than it sounds) that saves 1-2 seconds. Another is using auto-run, which saves one frame per room but loses some setup time. There are also a couple movement optimizations that save a few frames each, and RNG manipulation which can save a couple seconds throughout the run. Not counting the intentional time loss that was discussed earlier, this would roughly add up to about 5-6 seconds of optimization
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Is there a complete updated TAS record for that original version of the game?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
There is currently no other optimized TAS on the original version of the game. The only optimized TAS of this version of the game is tendog's TAS in this submission. The next closest thing was a segmented BTT run on the original version, which was completed a bit over a year ago. This BTT run is slightly faster in a few segments due to the new strats, but is slower overall than tendog's TAS. There's a comparison between that BTT run and tendog's TAS (the same one in this submission) here: Link to video
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Yeah we don't reject for being slower than an existing record if the record is on a version of the game that has different tricks.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
I uploaded an updated version of this submission here: User movie #638529454820077603 This updated version now syncs on libTAS v1.4.5. The changes are settings and formatting changes only, all of the inputs were preserved.
Masterjun
He/Him
Site Developer, Expert player (2047)
Joined: 10/12/2010
Posts: 1185
Location: Germany
As the one who made the decision for the initial rejection (this submission has since been accepted), I wanted to mention one thing about my third point of rejection:
Third, it intentionally loses time to do unnecessary things. We allow this if it makes up for the time loss in entertainment. But in this case, it only confuses the viewer further and makes the movie feel even less like a TAS.
And this point of discussion:
OceanBagel wrote:
To say this wasn't well-received is quite the understatement. Multiple communities lost faith in the TASVideos site because of this portion of the judgement, and feelings of distrust continue to this day. It felt like arbitrary gatekeeping to have small but meaningful nods to the game's community being cited as rejection reasons, as if they invalidate the months of work spent optimizing the other 99.8% of the TAS.
I'm not sure how much I can take this as a fact. But if this statement meant something like "Because a TASVideos judge said that the wasted frames were not entertaining, entire communities lost faith in the entire site", then I think this reaction is more dramatic than justified. In the judgment before this statement, I kept explaining what exactly we need to change on the site to make this submission acceptable. I mentioned twice that we needed discussions. I mentioned that these issues "need to be addressed". And yet, after the rejection, nobody discussed. This discussion thread contained two people who were unsatisfied with the unnecessary time waste. But that was fine, because we always had a history of revisiting rules and rejudging submissions. It's not like a rejection is final. Like, the steps were outlined. I personally can't really imagine entire communities losing faith over a single statement. I especially can't believe it, because nobody ever even tried to contact me about it. I didn't even know it was such a big deal. After all, it just had to be addressed, all someone needed to say was "dude I personally think your point is wrong, I do think it can be seen as an speed/entertainment tradeoff.". If this is true, then I think the statement was made to be a much bigger deal than it was actually meant to be.
Warning: Might glitch to credits I will finish this ACE soon as possible (or will I?)
InputEvelution
She/Her
Editor, Reviewer, Player (36)
Joined: 3/27/2018
Posts: 195
Location: Australia
Masterjun wrote:
I'm not sure how much I can take this as a fact. But if this statement meant something like "Because a TASVideos judge said that the wasted frames were not entertaining, entire communities lost faith in the entire site", then I think this reaction is more dramatic than justified.
I don't know how many communities OceanBagel was talking about here. However, I did mention on Discord the day before his post that the Wii series speedrunning community had also lost some faith in TASVideos as a result of this judgement, so it's possible that's where the "multiple" comes from, in which case I can probably give some more context. tendog was pretty active in the Wii series speedrunning community around this time, having submitted a Wii Sports Golf TAS to TASVideos only 3 months prior, so his next submission to TASVideos and the feedback it received ended up getting some attention there as well. The dissatisfaction with how things went was more related to the submission as a whole (the "rejected for being a demo" was probably a bigger point of frustration tbh), and was ultimately not the entire reason that the community came to lose interest in TASVideos. Negative feedback towards the Golf TAS mentioned prior, misunderstandings about how the "clean SRAM" and "must beat all known records" rules interacted, and the rejection later in 2019 of two Wii Party TASes - one for "being a minigame" despite not being a minigame - all helped contribute to feelings of hostility. The Deltarune TAS was simply one of many events over the course of 12 months that helped solidify that.
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (193)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 27
Masterjun wrote:
I'm not sure how much I can take this as a fact. But if this statement meant something like "Because a TASVideos judge said that the wasted frames were not entertaining, entire communities lost faith in the entire site", then I think this reaction is more dramatic than justified.
There was certainly an attitude among the Undertale and Deltarune communities of TASVideos being out of touch, and a large part of this was due to the rejection of this TAS. The biggest two reasons that upset people were the unacceptability of NG+ and the time loss due in part to visiting Sans. For NG+, that was just people upset at the policy at the time and didn't really have anything to do with the judgement. But for the time loss, people were upset that this was listed as a rejection reason in the first place despite the TASVideos policy of allowing speed-entertainment tradeoffs. It made it seem like even if every other issue were addressed, the TAS would still be rejected because Sans wasn't entertaining enough for TASVideos. This might not have been the case, but citing this small time loss as a reason for rejection certainly made it sound like it was. To paraphrase some of the reactions to the rejection in the Deltarune community, a lot of people started actively advocating for other speedrunners to not submit to TASVideos, some even suggesting attempting to create a separate TAS hosting service or propose a TAS section on speedrun.com. This continued for several years in both the Undertale and Deltarune communities. People were also complaining how they didn't like how acceptance on TASVideos depended on how cool the judge thinks your TAS is, referencing the Sans time loss. And along with all of this, it caused a lot of people to simply disengage with the site altogether, which is why the reaction didn't end up being particularly visible in this thread. Over time, people even started making jokes about how visiting Sans would make their speedruns unacceptable on TASVideos. This may not have been a fair or complete representation of the judgement, but the time loss rejection reason was a major part of the judgement that stuck out to people and so it carried over into their attitudes towards TASVideos. So you are correct that the reaction wasn't solely because of the time loss statement. The unacceptability of this type of NG+ run at the time of the original rejection was another big part of it. Naturally, some of the reaction was targeted at you (not by name, but rather as the judge who reviewed the Deltarune TAS). For everything but the speed-entertainment tradeoff, I think there was a logical reason for making the decision to reject at the time from a judging perspective. So for those other reasons, people were upset at TASVideos policy and not the judgement on its own. But the difference for the speed-entertainment tradeoff reason is that this came across as a misapplication of the relevant policy simply because the TASVideos judge didn't find it entertaining. I understand there was a bit more that went into it than just your opinion, but that wasn't the way the judgement text was interpreted by the communities. I believe nowadays this sort of subjective judgement call may include feedback from other sources than just the submission thread, such as Youtube comments or speedrunning community discords, which I think is the right direction to go. As for the current attitude of the Undertale and Deltarune communities, I'm happy to say that things are a lot better due in large part to the various rules updates and policy changes that have happened over the years. I feel like this site works best when there's an alignment between what people in a community want to TAS or see TASed and what can be accepted on TASVideos, and we're a lot closer to this than we were 5 years ago. This movie being accepted has had a very positive reaction from the Deltarune community and I'm glad that I could play a role in helping it along.
Masterjun
He/Him
Site Developer, Expert player (2047)
Joined: 10/12/2010
Posts: 1185
Location: Germany
So you are correct that the reaction wasn't solely because of the time loss statement.
That's all I wanted to know. Thanks.
Warning: Might glitch to credits I will finish this ACE soon as possible (or will I?)
Editor, Active player (459)
Joined: 2/11/2018
Posts: 240
Platform should be Windows?
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Ah, forgot it's stored in movies now too.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Post subject: Movie published
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15629
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [5988] Windows Deltarune "Chapter 1, NewGame+" by tendog in 25:37.67