Post subject: G&W simulator vs emulator
Fortranm
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (879)
Joined: 10/19/2013
Posts: 1121
Most of the stuff being discussed here is in future tense, but it's not a bad idea to start the discussion now. http://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Game_%26_Watch#Simulators Long story short: Libretro is adding simulator cores for G&W games, and MAME is implementing the ability to actually emulate G&W roms. It seems very likely that TASing those simulators via Libretrohawk might become possible(if ever) before TASing via MAME-core on Bizhawk does. If this turns out to be the case, will movies made with libretro G&W simulators be eligible for publication? Those cores aren't actual emulators, but does the simplistic nature of most G&W games make high-quality simulators good enough to represent the actual game?
EZGames69
He/They
Publisher, Reviewer, Expert player (4466)
Joined: 5/29/2017
Posts: 2763
Id be up for it. Although alot of game and watch games dont have any sort of speedrun capability, for example fire rescue, chef, fire attack, and so on. But games like Doneky Kong and such can definitely work. We do have a DK TAS for G&W Gallery but so far that's all we were able to do. I would love to see more TASes like this if we allow it. https://youtu.be/U1eY59o_Xr4
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't 12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!" Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish [Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
Accuracy is a slippery eel, and emulator vs simulator is not always well defined; while all of our major cores certainly do emulate basic cpu functionality, other parts of hardware are often simulated at a very low level of accuracy. So simply being a simulator isn't enough to disqualify something. The existence of a potentially higher quality emulation path also isn't enough to disqualify something unless that higher quality emulator is also fully TASable. I don't agree with this decision, but it's been the official TASVideos decision forever. Any particular GMW emulator or simulator should be examined for all of the usual criteria, including accuracy and TASability, but not prematurely rejected.