Posted: 3/15/2016 5:45 PM
Post subject: Octoshock and Fast Disc Speed ?
Quote
Lil_Gecko
He/Him
Player (97)
Joined: 4/7/2011
Posts: 520
First of all, thanks to the dev team. Bizhawk is amazing. Now my question : Since most of the RTA runners play PS1 games on a PS2 with Fast Disc Speed and Bizhawk emulate a PS1, loading times are way faster in the RTA comparing to a TAS which ultimately would lead to RTA being faster than TAS which can be problematic. I know Bizhawk isn't suppose to emulate a PS2 but still this bother me. So, would it be possible in a future to add a Fast Disc Speed setting to Octoshock or is it unrealistic/not needed ? Thanks in advance !
Posted: 3/15/2016 6:02 PM
Quote
Warepire
He/Him
Editor
Joined: 3/2/2010
Posts: 2178
Location: A little to the left of nowhere (Sweden)
Octoshock is a PS1 emulator, not a PS2 emulator.
Posted: 3/15/2016 6:23 PM
Quote
Lil_Gecko
He/Him
Player (97)
Joined: 4/7/2011
Posts: 520
Yeah I know that I mentionned it even. What I would like to know is if there was a way to speed up loading times, even if only for casual gaming. I'll take FF9 as an exemple as I'm familiar with it, just watching the intro, we are already 7 seconds behing the RTA times and that's only after 2 minutes. In an 8 hour movie, we're talking 20 minutes lost on loading times at least. I know my question can sound stupid but I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask anyway so...
Posted: 3/15/2016 6:46 PM
Quote
feos
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11469
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
NES TAS of 2011
I think it can be considered a speed hack. Is PS2 running those games on its hardware, or it's just an emulator? If the former, I don't think it makes sense to simulate it, since such disc speed is alien to PS1 (octoshock's goal is accuracy, you can't even increase internal resolution). If the latter, then it's a speed hack as it is, and it isn't going to be adopted for the same reason. It is all just my assumptions though.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Posted: 3/15/2016 11:35 PM
Quote
zeromus
Editor, Emulator Coder
Joined: 8/7/2008
Posts: 1156
It's running those games on hardware, but I don't see why it matters. Anyway, I have no interest in a speedhack. For casual gaming there's the fast forward key. You might could convince libretro to add it in their weird fork, which also has internal resolution increases. You could try convincing ryphecha to adding it to mednafen.
Posted: 3/15/2016 11:41 PM
Quote
natt
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
feos wrote:
I think it can be considered a speed hack. Is PS2 running those games on its hardware, or it's just an emulator? If the former, I don't think it makes sense to simulate it, since such disc speed is alien to PS1 (octoshock's goal is accuracy, you can't even increase internal resolution). If the latter, then it's a speed hack as it is, and it isn't going to be adopted for the same reason. It is all just my assumptions though.
PS2 runs PS1 games on hardware, but hardware with some differences and enhancements.
Posted: 3/15/2016 11:54 PM
Quote
Amaraticando
It/Its
Editor, Player (159)
Joined: 1/10/2012
Posts: 673
Location: Brazil
TAS of 2015 SNES TAS of 2015
Speedrunners are cheating, simply that. The same with people that use Virtual Console. Why do they usually bitch more about the later and totally forbid playing NTSC games on PAL consoles, or vice-versa?
Posted: 3/16/2016 12:00 AM
Quote
zeromus
Editor, Emulator Coder
Joined: 8/7/2008
Posts: 1156
You gotta have rules, or else theres chaos. And rules are arbitrary.
Posted: 3/16/2016 6:00 AM
Quote
andypanther
Any
Former player
Joined: 6/30/2010
Posts: 1107
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Lil_Gecko wrote:
I'll take FF9 as an exemple as I'm familiar with it, just watching the intro, we are already 7 seconds behing the RTA times and that's only after 2 minutes. In an 8 hour movie, we're talking 20 minutes lost on loading times at least.
A PS1 emulator shouldn't be designed to emulate a PS2. If you want that, use a PS2 emulator.
Current project: Gex 3 any% Paused: Gex 64 any% There are no N64 emulators. Just SM64 emulators with hacky support for all the other games.