I have a question. How about if I control Player 1 in game A, Player 2 in game B? Is it ok with rules?
The reason I need it, luck manipulation. Example my old project run:
Link to video
I have pending it because at Tekken 3 side got late with current run. It affected bad luck by Tekken 2 side.If do single controller in each game, then luck and actions will not affect by other controller, it'll have good luck and actions optimize more than
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11486
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Oh, you mean use different input for 2 games that way? I don't think it'd differ from playing them separately then.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Regarding the vid in the first post, I think it looks nice but you should focus on optimizing the slower game more (Tekken 3) so that they finish both at the same time. Maybe you could have a round in Tekken 2 where you don’t kill using the suicide attack, but normal combos so Tekken 3 can catch up to Tekken 2.
Oh, you mean use different input for 2 games that way? I don't think it'd differ from playing them separately then.
No sir, it'll have. Example 2 game with 1 controller: controller press move button for game A then it will affect to game B, the result will have moving in both games. Now example 2 game with 2 controllers: controller 1 press move button for game A then it will not affect to game B, the result will have only game A have moving, game B still freeze. Sure RNG will not same
ALAKTORN wrote:
Regarding the vid in the first post, I think it looks nice but you should focus on optimizing the slower game more (Tekken 3) so that they finish both at the same time. Maybe you could have a round in Tekken 2 where you don’t kill using the suicide attack, but normal combos so Tekken 3 can catch up to Tekken 2.
but the current run of Tekken 3 got optimized, no time for do any waste action. In first video, you'll easy see Tekken 3 side got affected moved and paused from Tekken 2 side. That's why it have bad luck, ugly actions, waste time
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11486
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
xxNKxx wrote:
No sir, it'll have. Example 2 game with 1 controller: controller press move button for game A then it will affect to game B, the result will have moving in both games. Now example 2 game with 2 controllers: controller 1 press move button for game A then it will not affect to game B, the result will have only game A have moving, game B still freeze. Sure RNG will not same
It is effectively using a separate input track for each game, and this is not what the usual trend "several games with one input" supports. And if so, why even make them a single movie?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11486
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Yes, but if you really want 2 games, just try hard enough to get them working with identical input. Even if it costs more time.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
