Looking at the Movie Statistics after a really long time not having checked them, I noticed that there's an awfully large amount of movies with only 1 rating.
Come on people, rate a bit more. People like their movies rated.
(Yeah, I know. I should be rating movies too... Maybe I'll spend some weekend watching and rating movies, at least those having only 1 or 2 ratings.)
As long as movie ratings are subject to harassment from people like swordless, I'm certainly never going to do one. I have better things to waste my time on than yet another irc argument. (Or maybe I don't...)
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Actually, now that I just got done with a really large project, I'm hoping I'll have the time to overhaul movie pages. Perhaps a more accessible and noticeable rating system will help.
Edit:
Get yourself into our top 30! http://tasvideos.org/rating.exe/my/
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
You can! Every single published movie has an associated discussion thread where you can post whatever kind of review you like.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
You mean like flag selected posts as a good review, and have it appear in a feed under the movie?
Perhaps I can offer something like that.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Well... not exactly what I had in mind.
A "review-ish" post can contain things unrelated to the review subject, such as personal comments or questions directed at the author, or something else like that; this way users would have to construct their posts specifically to be tagged as reviews. It's not very comfortable in my opinion.
I rather meant a text input field, say, somewhere on the publication's rating page, where a user could do a write up—they could copypaste their forum posts' content there if they so wished.
i agree with moozooh and i never looked into how to rate movies,nor have had any interest at all.
I want all good TAS inside TASvideos, it's my motto.
TAS i'm interested:
Megaman series, specially the RPGs! Where is the mmbn1 all chips TAS we deserve? Where is the Command Mission TAS?
i'm slowly moving away from TASing fighting games for speed, maybe it's time to start finding some entertainment value in TASing.
>>I rather meant a text input field, say, somewhere on the publication's rating page, where a user could do a write up
Hear hear!
Posting on the forum is one thing, posting a review is another.
I like the idea, but it raises the question of who would select/moderate those reviews, and how (and who's going to write the necessary code for it...)
Couldn't reviews go onto the wiki? Then you could format them, include extra screenshots, whatever. Linking them into the publications could simply be a matter of checking to see if a wiki node exists (e.g. wiki:GameReviews/GameName) and linking to it if it does; that node would then link to individual reviews.
So if you wanted to add a review to a game that didn't have any, first you'd create wiki:GameReviews/GameName/ReviewByYourName with your review of the game; then you'd create wiki:GameReviews/GameName and add a link to the review on that node. Then the next time the cache gets flushed, the site would pick up that there are reviews for GameName and link them from the publication.
Pyrel - an open-source rewrite of the Angband roguelike game in Python.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11475
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
I'd prefer creating a page for a game, and posting reviews inside the tabs or something.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Something like newgrounds?
www.newgrounds.com
They can rate the submission.(It's a really weird system, you can vote many times on the submission, one per days)
Then they have a review system under the submission.(You can review only one time and once it's sent to the database, it's final. You can't modify any content.
If I'm not mistaking, the rates system and the review's rates are completely separated.
Perhaps it's this kind of system you were looking for?
Note that i gave newgrounds as a example only
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player
(3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
Shouldn't be too hard to tie a review to a movie in the backend. I have no immediate ideas on the GUI, such as where the user would click to get this form. Nor who would moderate it, but I'm sure we can find people to do it.
I support this idea.
This is my idea for a new way to rate movies to encourage more people to rate runs. (Please excuse the crudity of the animation.) It's simple and pretty fun to use. I don't know how hard it would be to implement though.
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player
(3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
The minimum that needs to happen is for something like that to be on the movie module itself. Clicking rate would open up a gui for selecting the values, rather than taking you to a new page.
However, this requires coding, which we are severely bottlenecked on.
This.
Ideally, people should be able to rate the movie while still watching it (maybe near the end of playing it).
Also. My dream is that this module would additionally pop up a tooltip-like list of "movies I rated", hinting the place this movie will take in this list if I confirm the current positions of sliders by clicking "Rate!". That list should only show 3 entries above and 3 entries below the movie, so I can quickly glance at the tooltip, remember the awesomeness of those old movies and compare the movie I just watched to those movies, then readjust my rating if needed, and after seeing its new place, confirm the rating.
I think this feature would greatly encourage ratings and discourage manipulations, since people will be thinking in terms of their personal collection, and not in terms of average statistics of the site.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11475
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
The first thing to be done about that is moving the most active raters tab to the end, and actually rated movies tabs to the beginning.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
There could be checkboxes to the left of the sliders that are automatically checked, but can be unchecked to allow members to not rate in a certain category. To prevent abuse, if both boxes are unchecked, the rate button could become grayed out.
And it would be great to have this on the publication page itself, as adelikat said.
Abuse?
Anyways, the current system allows for someone to not only change but also remove their rating (on one or both categories) if they so wish, for whatever reason. It's probably a good idea to retain the possibility. (Therefore the rate button should be enabled all the time.)