Post subject: Megaman series buster only
Joined: 12/24/2004
Posts: 50
Location: NYC
any one ever thought of making a nes megaman film only using the buster with the acepption of fighting the bosses that are invincible to the buster
<small>Oversize signature cleared by admin; read <a href="http://tasvideos.org/ForumRules.html">forum rules</a>.</small>
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
yeah
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Former player
Joined: 8/1/2004
Posts: 2687
Location: Seattle, WA
I never really understood people trying to make timeattacks/speedruns with critereon such as 'use only the basic weapon'. Not only does it slow down the whole movie, but it tends to get boring really really fast. Also, keep in mind that using the buster only would get rid of a lot of the cool glitches.
hi nitrodon streamline: cyn-chine
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Yeah, the other weapons make it more interesting. Using the basic weapon only could be more of a personal challenge than something to make a movie out of.
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Joined: 4/26/2004
Posts: 149
What about the impossibility of completing the game? Wily level 4 in MM2 can't be beaten without Crash Man's weapon.
Post subject: Re: Megaman series buster only
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Too_Bored wrote:
with the acepption of fighting the bosses that are invincible to the buster
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Joined: 4/26/2004
Posts: 149
I guess I didn't understand that word.
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Yes, because it's "exception"!
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Ambassador, Experienced player (710)
Joined: 7/17/2004
Posts: 985
Location: The FLOATING CASTLE
I think it's a stupid idea. In a timeattack, I don't want to see someone hold back on using something unless it means something else interesting happens. For example, not warping in Rygar or Battletoads leads to an amazing array of tricks used to beat the various levels, both variations are amazing runs. But restricting special weapons in Megaman takes something away without adding anything interesting. Now why would you want to do that?
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Well, I guess it might be considered a show of skill to beat everything with a weak weapon. But this site isn't about skill anyway.
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Joined: 4/26/2004
Posts: 149
Yeah, buster-only runs are more fun to play than they are to watch. I had this one friend who trained himself to play Mega Man 3 on a Play Choice 10 machine using one hand. That was pretty interesting to watch.
Former player
Joined: 8/1/2004
Posts: 2687
Location: Seattle, WA
Buster-only in Mega Man is the equivalent of a knife run in Resident Evil 4; it is possible, but why pass up on the more efficient/entertaining methods?
hi nitrodon streamline: cyn-chine
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bag of Magic Food wrote:
Well, I guess it might be considered a show of skill to beat everything with a weak weapon. But this site isn't about skill anyway.
Sure it is - but about a different kind of skill.
Joined: 4/24/2005
Posts: 104
schneelocke wrote:
Bag of Magic Food wrote:
Well, I guess it might be considered a show of skill to beat everything with a weak weapon. But this site isn't about skill anyway.
Sure it is - but about a different kind of skill.
But that kind of skill tends to get boring and therefore, it's not needed here at Nesvideos. It's more fun to watch a player stroll through the whole with the proper use of weapons, rather than look at a boring run, wouldn't you agree?
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Iriasu wrote:
schneelocke wrote:
Sure it is - but about a different kind of skill.
But that kind of skill tends to get boring and therefore, it's not needed here at Nesvideos. It's more fun to watch a player stroll through the whole with the proper use of weapons, rather than look at a boring run, wouldn't you agree?
Sure - and I don't think a buster-only movie would be *that* interesting. I just wanted to point out that the statement that this site is not about skill is untrue. ^^
Joined: 1/1/2022
Posts: 1716
only lazy people use the X-buster to finish the game =D
Joined: 1/1/2022
Posts: 1716
the only difference between using the xbuster and using all the weapons to finish the game is time, it doesnt get more difficult or less difficult
Former player
Joined: 7/15/2004
Posts: 124
Ever tried killing Elecman with just the mega buster? You don't know what you're talking about.
Former player
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 484
Location: ­­
With savestates and slowdown, I can't imagine much of a challenge...
Player (206)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
And it's possible to get ElecMan into a stupid pattern if you have good timing.
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Player (86)
Joined: 3/8/2005
Posts: 973
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Iceman = Impossible in a speedrun. If someone did do a buster timeattack.. that would be the only thing to intertest me. Other then that.. Like others said.. this is a entertaining site.. I leanred that the hard way.. If they were to make a new catigory for movies, i think it should be like.. a speedrun spot.. or a no glitch spot. but.. too much work... so scrap that. Rockman 1 is faster with no glitch in some spots though. :)
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Player (86)
Joined: 3/8/2005
Posts: 973
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
I would love to see someone defeat iceman with no tools.... and no deaths.. and only buster...