Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
[23:49] <sonicpacker> I don't think Sonikkustar's vote on the 0 star should count...as in the 7 he gave it for entertainment. It was only because he doesn't like me. He gave the old 0 star a 9 in that category and the runs are almost identical.
[23:50] <sonicpacker> Also, when will it be given its star back?
[23:53] <sonicpacker> And this:
[23:53] <sonicpacker> "This movie is 40 frames faster than the previous movie due to a new route and extreme optimization, explained in the submission message."
[23:53] <sonicpacker> is false.
[23:49] <sonicpacker> I don't think Sonikkustar's vote on the 0 star should count...as in the 7 he gave it for entertainment. It was only because he doesn't like me. He gave the old 0 star a 9 in that category and the runs are almost identical.
[23:50] <sonicpacker> Also, when will it be given its star back?
[23:53] <sonicpacker> And this:
[23:53] <sonicpacker> "This movie is 40 frames faster than the previous movie due to a new route and extreme optimization, explained in the submission message."
[23:53] <sonicpacker> is false.
sonnikkustar's vote should be treated the same way as all of the other votes. entertainment ratings are usually pretty subjective. a huge mario fan tends to enjoy a SM64 way more than let's say a metroid fan.
it's just not possible for everybody to feel the same about every run.
giving a low rating to the technical quality would be a different story, though.
btw, I think sonikkustar also gave the Majora's Mask TAS a 7 or something, maybe he simply isn't a fan of N64 games.
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
MrGrunz wrote:
sonicpacker wrote:
[23:49] <sonicpacker> I don't think Sonikkustar's vote on the 0 star should count...as in the 7 he gave it for entertainment. It was only because he doesn't like me. He gave the old 0 star a 9 in that category and the runs are almost identical.
[23:50] <sonicpacker> Also, when will it be given its star back?
[23:53] <sonicpacker> And this:
[23:53] <sonicpacker> "This movie is 40 frames faster than the previous movie due to a new route and extreme optimization, explained in the submission message."
[23:53] <sonicpacker> is false.
sonnikkustar's vote should be treated the same way as all of the other votes. entertainment ratings are usually pretty subjective. a huge mario fan tends to enjoy a SM64 way more than let's say a metroid fan.
it's just not possible for everybody to feel the same about every run.
giving a low rating to the technical quality would be a different story, though.
btw, I think sonikkustar also gave the Majora's Mask TAS a 7 or something, maybe he simply isn't a fan of N64 games.
As I already stated, he gave the old 0 star (2 runs ago) a 9. I know he rated this one lower because he doesn't like me. I don't personally care. I was just pointing it out. It's going to be one of the most popular (if not THE most popular) movies on the site regardless of 1 biased vote.
Dude, you should keep in mind that a previous movie even if slower can be more fun than your new current run. You can't base your point on that.
ex:
I could say that I prefer this ending, rather the new one, since it failed to jump accuratly on the third falling platform.
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
BadPotato wrote:
Dude, you should keep in mind that a previous movie even if slower can be more fun than your new current run. You can't base your point on that
I can base it on that because the amount of differences between the 2 movies (less than 1 second) are so minuscule (excluding ONE thing) that there's no way it would lose 2 points in that "category."
SP, honestly if you're talking about comparison with the Japs' last run which included a blj'ful BitFS, you should hold back before getting all judgemental. I personally liked that BitFS WAY more than this new faster one which just wall kicks up cause it had so much more action. So 2 stars would be reasonable IMO...
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
BrainStormer wrote:
SP, honestly if you're talking about comparison with the Japs' last run which included a blj'ful BitFS, you should hold back before getting all judgemental. I personally liked that BitFS WAY more than this new faster one which just wall kicks up cause it had so much more action. So 2 stars would be reasonable IMO...
As if your opinion is respectable on the situation. You hate the entire current 0 star team. Regardless of that, I'm not talking about it. I clearly said:
As I already stated, he gave the old 0 star (2 runs ago) a 9
I know enough about Sonikkustar and his mentality to realize why he voted 2 points lower. As I said, I don't care because it is going to have a high rating no matter what. Trying to change my view is pointless.
