Player (79)
Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Utah
Yeah, that's what I meant. :P
Experienced player (603)
Joined: 2/8/2009
Posts: 656
here's the woodfall temple section of my MM TAS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLUNDSKq2GA
Skilled player (1099)
Joined: 8/26/2006
Posts: 1139
Location: United Kingdom
:-D Just fantastic.
Don't expect any more WIPs until the run is finished!
Dude, watching this in small teasers is tough enough, an unseen run from Woodfall to the end without an insight will completely floor me. I look forward to it :-) Great work.
Active player (259)
Joined: 12/3/2008
Posts: 61
Oh crap guys, you've been obsoleted by a normal run! Are you gonna let this happen? http://speeddemosarchive.com/ZeldaMajorasMask.html
Experienced player (603)
Joined: 2/8/2009
Posts: 656
you know, that I'm working on a TAS aiming for 1:30? :P 50 minutes done yet
Skilled player (1326)
Joined: 9/7/2007
Posts: 1354
Location: U.S.
How far are you?
Player (79)
Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Utah
Eratyx wrote:
Oh crap guys, you've been obsoleted by a normal run! Are you gonna let this happen? http://speeddemosarchive.com/ZeldaMajorasMask.html
That improvement is only ten minutes you know. ;)
Active player (259)
Joined: 12/3/2008
Posts: 61
Captain Forehead wrote:
Eratyx wrote:
Oh crap guys, you've been obsoleted by a normal run! Are you gonna let this happen? http://speeddemosarchive.com/ZeldaMajorasMask.html
That improvement is only ten minutes you know. ;)
It's actually more like 3:17. I'm of the opinion that SDA has wishy-washy standards regarding timing.
Experienced player (504)
Joined: 1/12/2007
Posts: 682
I'm of the opinion that SDA has wishy-washy standards regarding timing. That's not an opinion, it's a fact.
Joined: 11/16/2009
Posts: 20
An improvement is an improvement. And 3 minutes is a pretty significant margin for a normal speedrun to beat a TAS. Not that it matters, since the new TAS will completely blow that out of the water.
Joined: 11/15/2009
Posts: 12
Hm... 3:17... at 60 FPS (Majora's runs at 20 on Mupen for some odd reason, but I've noticed every third frame actually plays sound or for that matter even advances the video at all) that's 11,820 frames. Even the author said he had a few mistakes that wouldn't be there in a TAS...
arflech
He/Him
Joined: 5/3/2008
Posts: 1120
Eratyx wrote:
Oh crap guys, you've been obsoleted by a normal run! Are you gonna let this happen? http://speeddemosarchive.com/ZeldaMajorasMask.html
The answer is yes; I remember there was a period of several months during which the SDA record for OoT was faster than the published TAS, and given the speed improvements found since then I wouldn't be surprised to see that situation happen again.
i imgur com/QiCaaH8 png
Joined: 11/16/2009
Posts: 20
Indeed, it's totally cyclical. A TAS pushes the speedrun limits, then the newly shortened route leads to better real-time runs, which continue to get shorter until they beat the published TAS. Then a new TAS is published, starting the cycle anew. The circle of life. This of course, doesn't happen to games where most of what is done simply CAN'T be done in a real-time run. Then the TAS reigns supreme.
Experienced player (603)
Joined: 2/8/2009
Posts: 656
I'm actually pretty convinced, that the new MM TAS will never get beaten by a non-TAS run in the future, because a TAS is normally around 10-15 minutes quicker than a non-TAS run. that means, that we had to figure out stuff, that saves 15 minutes off the run, which is pretty unlikely we've pretty much pushed the game to its limits. of course, there are small timesavers left to discover, but that should be all only thing, that could possible happen once, is an all temples skip, but I doubt, that we'll discover something like this
Sir_VG
He/Him
Player (40)
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 1913
Location: Floating Tower
arflech wrote:
Eratyx wrote:
Oh crap guys, you've been obsoleted by a normal run! Are you gonna let this happen? http://speeddemosarchive.com/ZeldaMajorasMask.html
The answer is yes; I remember there was a period of several months during which the SDA record for OoT was faster than the published TAS, and given the speed improvements found since then I wouldn't be surprised to see that situation happen again.
We're still waiting on that ActRaiser improvement too. It's only been 2 years since I beat OgreSlayer's time...
Taking over the world, one game at a time. Currently TASing: Nothing
Joined: 12/6/2008
Posts: 1193
Btw. it's not like this comes as a suprise to us. Jijos route is heavily based on our TAS-route and we helped him planing here and there. We also saw this run when it was being made, through live streaming. ;)
Joined: 11/16/2009
Posts: 20
MrGrunz wrote:
I'm actually pretty convinced, that the new MM TAS will never get beaten by a non-TAS run in the future, because a TAS is normally around 10-15 minutes quicker than a non-TAS run. that means, that we had to figure out stuff, that saves 15 minutes off the run, which is pretty unlikelywe've pretty much pushed the game to its limits. of course, there are small timesavers left to discover, but that should be allonly thing, that could possible happen once, is an all temples skip, but I doubt, that we'll discover something like this
Eh, I can agree with that. There does seem to be a critical point when a TAS becomes so far beyond a real-time run it's no longer in a position to catch up. This might be the TAS that does that for MM. Maybe not, though.
Player (118)
Joined: 5/13/2009
Posts: 700
Location: suffern, ny
unless of course new glitches are discovered, a new route is uncovered and there is a a new sequence break, then yes, but then the TAS will beat it again
[19:16] <scrimpy> silly portuguese [19:16] <scrimpy> it's like spanish, only less cool
Joined: 11/15/2009
Posts: 12
Just tried sequence breaking by only freeing one giant. (you need one to learn Oath to Order, of course) Turns out you *can* play the Oath to Order and *can* get the giant to come, but the moon doesn't stop. Will try with two and three giants and see if that works. lol, not only did the bad ending not finish, but for some reason Project64 gave an exception error... I have found something that may speed up the water hopping portions as a Deku Scrub though (if there are any left with new TAS runs): Spinning off the ledge causes you to hop forward at the same speed you spun with. (sorta like the shield/bomb trick only forward instead) I'm sure it's been noticed before, but just in case it hasn't... And looking at the SDA video, I see a good few minutes of improvement that are just due to human error... I could easily see this end up at close to 1:45 if not 1:30 TAS'ed...
Player (118)
Joined: 5/13/2009
Posts: 700
Location: suffern, ny
Mr Grunz has said that he expects about 1:30
[19:16] <scrimpy> silly portuguese [19:16] <scrimpy> it's like spanish, only less cool
Joined: 1/3/2006
Posts: 334
GregW17 wrote:
Just tried sequence breaking by only freeing one giant. (you need one to learn Oath to Order, of course) Turns out you *can* play the Oath to Order and *can* get the giant to come, but the moon doesn't stop. Will try with two and three giants and see if that works. lol, not only did the bad ending not finish, but for some reason Project64 gave an exception error... I have found something that may speed up the water hopping portions as a Deku Scrub though (if there are any left with new TAS runs): Spinning off the ledge causes you to hop forward at the same speed you spun with. (sorta like the shield/bomb trick only forward instead) I'm sure it's been noticed before, but just in case it hasn't... And looking at the SDA video, I see a good few minutes of improvement that are just due to human error... I could easily see this end up at close to 1:45 if not 1:30 TAS'ed...
No offense... but have you ever even played the game?
Player (118)
Joined: 5/13/2009
Posts: 700
Location: suffern, ny
he probably hasn't or he would know that sequence breaking this game by getting less than four giants doesn't work.
[19:16] <scrimpy> silly portuguese [19:16] <scrimpy> it's like spanish, only less cool
Joined: 12/6/2008
Posts: 1193
The programmers would have been really stupid if they made it that easy. Less than 4 giants can't hold the moon. End of story. And yes we know that Deku Water umps are faster if you do them out of a spin. But out of a sidehop is even a little bit faster than that, so that is used in the TAS.
Player (210)
Joined: 7/7/2006
Posts: 798
Location: US
Slowking wrote:
Less than 4 giants can't hold the moon. End of story
Can 2 giants hold half the moon? Perhaps they could at least slightly alter the trajectory such that only half the world is destroyed.
Player (79)
Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Utah