Post subject: Suggestion: Newest Submissions
Sir_VG
He/Him
Player (40)
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 1913
Location: Floating Tower
I know that published movies are removed, but can we remove rejected/canceled submissions from there too? There's no point in them staying, IMO. It'll look cleaner.
Taking over the world, one game at a time. Currently TASing: Nothing
Post subject: Re: Suggestion: Newest Submissions
Skilled player (1410)
Joined: 5/31/2004
Posts: 1821
Sir VG wrote:
I know that published movies are removed, but can we remove rejected/canceled submissions from there too? There's no point in them staying, IMO. It'll look cleaner.
Published movies are removed? From where?
Editor, Expert player (2478)
Joined: 4/8/2005
Posts: 1573
Location: Gone for a year, just for varietyyyyyyyyy!!
Front Page wrote:
Newest submissions 2009-02-09 #2178 NES Cheetahmen II (unknown) by was0x in 02:21.57 (decision: cancelled) 2009-02-09 #2177 NES Deja Vu (USA,r1) by Randil in 10:16.98 (publication underway) 2009-02-09 #2176 Genesis Ghouls 'N Ghosts (USA/Europe,r2) by shisu in 07:30.92 (decision: cancelled) 2009-02-07 #2174 GBA Mega Man Zero (USA/Europe) by computerbird in 21:04.13 (new)
I think removing the cancelled/rejected submissions from the list is a bad idea, because it would diminish the introductory value of the front page. It gives good information now: some movies are indeed cancelled/rejected.
Joined: 2/26/2007
Posts: 1365
Location: Minnesota
I hardly ever view the front page, but I agree with aqfaq. The published ones are... published. But, for example, Cheetahmen II fanboys, they will register for the forums and say "Where the fuck did cheetahmen go?! Did it get published or what? did it disappear?" Keeping it the way it is lets them see what is up with the movie quickly, and in a non-confusing way.
adelikat wrote:
I very much agree with this post.
Bobmario511 wrote:
Forget party hats, Christmas tree hats all the way man.
Sir_VG
He/Him
Player (40)
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 1913
Location: Floating Tower
But the problem is that they'll stay there forever. There could be 50 submissions over the next 6 months, they all get published, and then all we'd see is some fricken 6 month old movie that got canceled and nobody cares about anymore.
Taking over the world, one game at a time. Currently TASing: Nothing
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Or perhaps the site shows the newest submissions in the last time period, which means that they would eventually vanish regardless of wether or not every movie submitted afterwards was published or not. Do the research. Haste makes waste.
Perma-banned