Same video, but poker related and probably won't make any sense to anyone here. It's the hardest I've laughed at a youtube video/similar thing ever though. Insanely funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6qc_QRy6B4
Same video, but poker related and probably won't make any sense to anyone here. It's the hardest I've laughed at a youtube video/similar thing ever though. Insanely funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6qc_QRy6B4
On the contrary, fellow 2+2er, that was funny enough for me to want to go wake up Emil, and MS paint Hitler wearing a Full Tilt jersey. I am in your debt for my weekly laugh :)
Same video, but poker related and probably won't make any sense to anyone here. It's the hardest I've laughed at a youtube video/similar thing ever though. Insanely funny.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6qc_QRy6B4
On the contrary, fellow 2+2er, that was funny enough for me to want to go wake up Emil, and MS paint Hitler wearing a Full Tilt jersey. I am in your debt for my weekly laugh :)
Today news just mention about this video, I didn't hear what happened. Can anyone from Dutch (or knows Dutch) explains what's going on from this video? I tried using Babelfish but it explains nothing about the guy throwing wine spill at other guy's face.
Babelfish translated description wrote:
Not judicious, however, understandable. Innocently to the opposite, is one of the most important provisions of our Dutch legal system it is proved. Someone who is taken up, is firstly suspected and after pronouncement of a judge is possible they he or eventually guilty or innocently were becomes. By this provision the everyone has possibility of defending itself. crime receiver peter R. freezes suggests that Joran of of the ditch are guilty to assassination whereas all options concerning Natalee Holloway still are open. They has been until now not yet identified/retrieved.
I'm not Dutch, and certainly not from Dutch, but I think it says: Not sensible, but still understandable. Innocent until the opposite is proven, is one of the most important provisions of our Dutch court system. Someone who is apprehended, is first a suspect and by the pronouncement of a judge, he or she can eventually be declared guilty or innocent. Through this provision, everyone has the chance of defending himself. Misdeed reporter Peter R., the "Freeze", suggests that Joran from the Ditch is guilty of murder whereas all options concerning Natalee Holloway are still open. She is to this day not yet identified/retrieved.
It seems that Joran from the Ditch is angry with Peter the Freeze for being accused by murder on TV.
Can anyone from Dutch (or knows Dutch) explains what's going on from this video?
I can somewhat, I watched the show. This video is however what happened shortly after the show, so this wasn't on television.
I'm no expert on the subject, but this is what I think I know about it:
In the show, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway was discussed. This is an american girl who disappeared on Aruba (there was even a dr. Phil episode about this). The last known person to have seen her is Joran van der Sloot, a Dutch boy who lived on Aruba with his parents (Aruba belonged to the Netherlands, and I believe they speak dutch there). When he was questioned by the police, Joran van der Sloot told them a story that turned out to be a lie. The story he currently claims to have happened involves him leaving the girl on her own at the beach at night. Joran was the main suspect, but wasn't charged.
Peter R. de Vries is a dutch 'crime reporter' and hosts a very well known tv program in the Netherlands where he exposes criminals, unknown facts about crimes and many more. He is convinced that Joran is responsible for the disappearance (after all, why would he have lied?) and went to visit him on Aruba to ask him questions. Joran obviously didn't comply. Now that it turned out that Joran wasn't being charged, Joran and his parents agreed to talk to Peter R. de Vries on a well known show about the disappearance. Peter R. de Vries asked lots of questions about why Joran lied, and other things he thought were curious about the case. After the show was over Joran threw wine in Peter R. de Vries' face. Later Joran stated that during the show he became more and more annoyed by Peter and he had to let it out.
I didn't get it. It was difficult to watch the entire video through because it was so boring...
(There aren't many things which are more exasperating in videos than a constantly shaking camera. If you are going to make a video, keep the camera as stable as possible and focus on the subject. There's nothing more irritating than a constant random shaking and the subject being half the time out of picture.)
The video was unnecessarily shaky. Blair Witch was meant to look like it was shot by an amateur film crew - it also added to the atmosphere - but in the Link video it just looks sloppy.
My current project: Something mysterious (oooooh!)
My username is all lower-case letters. Please get it right :(
heh, you should have put the "ahh fuck you luigi" <from> in there at ~1:15 where luigi goes on and on about absolutely nothing. granted, you DO have to turn your speakers up very high, AND be listening for it... but i am sure you could find a way around that ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghg9emVy_ZM&feature=related goes right to the scene of the crime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL4JSXojv-4 gives the much needed background information before the drop of mr. f.
adelikat wrote:
I very much agree with this post.
Bobmario511 wrote:
Forget party hats, Christmas tree hats all the way man.
This happened to me once in Bowser's Castle, and I always thought it was my strangest gaming experience. It's nice to know there's an explanation behind it. I've always described it as a combination of the Legend of Zelda completed puzzle sound and the normal one up sound.
