Post by Warp

Posted: 4/28/2007 3:05 PM

Quote

moozooh

Senior Moderator

Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away

Statistics can't be positive or negative by definition (not to mention that the page already includes some of the "negative" criteria, anyway), so I say go for it. The more information, the merrier. :)

Warp wrote:

Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.

Posted: 4/28/2007 5:23 PM

Quote

Randil

Skilled player (1828)

Joined: 4/20/2005
Posts: 2161
Location: Norrköping, Sweden

arkiandruski wrote:

I think they're trying to be positive with their statistics page, which I think is a good idea.

Well, the Movie Statistics page already includes things like "Least downloaded .avi" and "smallest amount of data downloaded", which aren't really that positive if you think about it. Anyway, this was just an idea I had, I won't cry myself to sleep if it's not implemented. :P

My own page on this site.

Posted: 4/28/2007 6:39 PM

Quote

Warp

Banned User

Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland

Randil wrote:

Would it be possible to include things like "Lowest Technical rating", "Lowest entertainment rating", and things like that too? Or is it only me who's interested in those things? :P

It's perfectly possible, and actually any editor could do it (because the module supports ordering from biggest to smallest and the other way around). However, as someone said, I don't know if that's such a good idea because I feel it kind of mocks the authors of those movies... Btw, I added a simple check to the module: If the same movie id appears twice in a row in a list, it ignores the second appearance. This should fix the needless repetitions.

Posted: 4/29/2007 6:02 AM

Quote

Chamale

He/Him

Player (182)

Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada

I think it would be morbidly funny to list lowest entertainment value... But then, it does mock the authors. Still, the authors know that the rating is low. If we make it show only non-obseleted movies, then it might motivate authors to improve their movies.

Posted: 4/29/2007 9:01 AM

Quote

Warp

Banned User

Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland

Perhaps a poll should be posted?

Posted: 4/29/2007 9:10 AM

Quote

Aqfaq

Editor, Expert player (2480)

Joined: 4/8/2005
Posts: 1573
Location: Gone for a year, just for varietyyyyyyyyy!!

Post the poll.

Posted: 4/29/2007 1:11 PM

Quote

moozooh

Senior Moderator

Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away

Chamale wrote:

I think it would be morbidly funny to list lowest entertainment value... But then, it does mock the authors. Still, the authors know that the rating is low.

I fail to see that as something the author shouldn't be ready for beforehand, especially since low entertainment rating depends on a poor game choice in nearly all cases. That shouldn't prevent statistics from having place, it would help the others notice lowest rated movies faster and possibly try to improve them regardless of who the current author is (see also: Jaws).

Chamale wrote:

Still, the authors know that the rating is low. If we make it show only non-obseleted movies, then it might motivate authors to improve their movies.

Do you see anything obsolete on that list?

Warp wrote:

Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.

Posted: 4/29/2007 1:28 PM

Quote

Warp

Banned User

Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland

Aqfaq wrote:

Post the poll.

Unfortunately I don't have permission to do that.

Posted: 5/19/2007 10:56 AM

Quote

Aqfaq

Editor, Expert player (2480)

Joined: 4/8/2005
Posts: 1573
Location: Gone for a year, just for varietyyyyyyyyy!!

The number of individual players is missing from the general statistics. Also, it might be interesting to have the average movie rating per system.

Posted: 5/19/2007 1:39 PM

Quote

Chamale

He/Him

Player (182)

Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada

Aqfaq wrote:

Also, it might be interesting to have the average movie rating per system.

Interesting. I'm guessing the stronger the system, the more the rating. But it would be opposite for technical (hard to optimize 3D games) so it balances out. Would it be possible to have some graphs on the page? Of AVI length, rating, etc.

Posted: 5/19/2007 1:44 PM

Quote

Fabian

Former player

Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 1711

If I had to speculate (and speculating is fun), I would guess N64 would have slightly lower average entertainment rating than Genesis. SNES and NES would destroy them. Game boy, no idea. Probably sucks too, but not as much as N64 and Genesis.

Zoey Ridin' High <Fabian_> I prett much never drunk

Posted: 5/19/2007 2:22 PM

Quote

laughing_gas

Former player

Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp

Also remember that the NES and SNES dominate the "lowest ratings" lists, so it all evens out.

Borg Collective wrote:

Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.

Posted: 5/19/2007 6:45 PM

Quote

JXQ

Experienced player (761)

Joined: 5/6/2005
Posts: 3132

Platform    Average    Sample Size
-----------------------------------
NES         6.5444     216
SNES        6.8108     93
SG          6.2452     62
GB          6.9512     41
N64         7.0857     7

Probably contains errors here and there (did this somewhat quickly).

<Swordless> Go hug a tree, you vegetarian (I bet you really are one)

Posted: 5/19/2007 7:14 PM

Quote

moozooh

Senior Moderator

Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away

Haha, wow, Genesis runs indeed do need improvement. >_> I'm also surprised by GB's performance in your chart.

Warp wrote:

Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.

Posted: 5/20/2007 11:39 AM

Quote

Tub

Joined: 6/25/2005
Posts: 1377

y = amount of movies having roughly this length?

m00

Posted: 5/20/2007 11:44 AM

Quote

nitsuja

Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1311)

Joined: 12/21/2004
Posts: 2687

In other words, a histogram.

Posted: 5/20/2007 7:48 PM

Quote

Warp

Banned User

Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland

I have commented on this before. While most movies fall into a more or less small range of lengths (and other parameters), the total range of lengths is very wide. This would mean that to show all the movies in one graph the resolution would have to be quite coarse. For example, if each bar represented one minute (ie. the first bar would represent movies between 0 and 60 seconds long, the second one movies between 60 and 120 seconds, etc), the last bar in the graph would be at minute 261. Most movies would be packed between the 0-45 minute range (only 17% of the total width of the graph) and the rest would consist of mostly individual 1-sized bars here and there. In other words, the first fifth of the graph would have a tight bell curve, and four fifths would consist of sparse tiny bars distributed here and there. I'm not sure this would be very informative.

Posted: 5/21/2007 5:08 AM

Quote

Xkeeper

Banned User

Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850

Eh, you could always just give ranges: 0-2, 2-4, 5-8, 8-15, 15-60, 60-*, for example. Granted, this is very, very large ranges, but you get the idea.

Perma-banned

Posted: 5/21/2007 5:15 AM

Quote

asteron

Joined: 2/16/2005
Posts: 462

I think instead of a strict histogram maybe you maybe should try a convolution where you weight each item based off a bell curve. (Basically like a moving average) Histograms with sparse data have the problem where you can get very different shapes with small changes in the data.

This signature is much better than its previous version.

Posted: 9/29/2007 5:18 PM

Post subject: Movie statistics suggestion: Biggest improvement

Quote

Chamale

He/Him

Player (182)

Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada

Basically, when a movie improves on a published movie by a lot, it gets listed. There would be two listings: Percentage of the old run's time Elapsed time. Might be interesting to see where huge improvements had been made. [Edit by Bisqwit: This suggestion does not deserve its own thread. Moving it into the thread that talks about the Movie Statistics page.]

Posted: 9/29/2007 5:22 PM

Quote

DeHackEd

Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Former player

Joined: 11/6/2004
Posts: 833

Relative to an immediate obsoletion, or relative to the very first movie published? Plus there are a few issues. Super Mario 64 might be a candidate for the best improvement due to the 15 stars skipped. In contrast, the collection of 16 star movies alone might be a more meaningful statistic, but the grouping of the 1-star run into it would throw it off.

Posted: 9/29/2007 5:27 PM

Quote

laughing_gas

Former player

Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp

Another issue is a "category or goal change" obsoletion, such as Mortal Kombat 2 or Zanac. Actually I'm not sure if the warp in Zanac counts as a cheat or not, if not then it doesn't have this issue.

Borg Collective wrote:

Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.

Posted: 9/29/2007 5:34 PM

Quote

moozooh

Senior Moderator

Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away

I support the idea. Category change cases might be solved by having their classes compared directly (if they differ, the successor movie doesn't get listed). Improvement should be counted by the percentage of the time saved over the direct predecessor.

Warp wrote:

Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.

Posted: 9/29/2007 6:41 PM

Quote

Chamale

He/Him

Player (182)

Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada

"Smallest improvement" might also be interesting, to see what games get "frame-warred". Of course, it's tricky to phrase that in a positive way.

Forum Site New movie statistics page

Forum

Site

New movie statistics page