Posted: 12/9/2010 9:40 AM
Post subject: Award Idea: Gruefood delight of the year
Quote
scrimpeh
Editor, Skilled player (1438)
Joined: 3/31/2010
Posts: 2107
TAS of 2017 First edition TAS of 2017 PSX TAS of 2017
Just a little idea I had been kicking around, This should be pretty self-explanatory. If we already have a gruefood delight, why don't we crown the best of it in a way? What do you guys think?
Posted: 12/9/2010 3:08 PM
Quote
Warp
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
I think it would be a bit odd to effectively say "this run was not good enough to be published, but good enough for an award". Perhaps the awarded run could get published as an additional reward?
Posted: 12/9/2010 3:55 PM
Quote
alden
Player (121)
Joined: 2/11/2007
Posts: 1522
Perhaps Warp wants that reward to apply... retroactively??? ;) http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7662 Thought I did a list for 2009 as well but I guess I didn't because lazy.
I make a comic with no image files and you should read it. While there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free. -Eugene Debs
Posted: 12/9/2010 5:41 PM
Quote
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4109)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4089
Location: The Netherlands
Exotic platforms TASer of 2018 Exotic platforms TAS of 2018 Exotic platforms TASer of 2017 Exotic platforms TAS of 2017 Exotic platforms TAS of 2017 Exotic platforms TASer of 2016 Exotic platforms TAS of 2016 Gameboy TASer of 2013
I don't think this is a good idea. Runs in the gruefood are usually not published because they're not good enough for the site. Having an award for them on the site kind of contradicts the purpose of not accepting runs.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Posted: 12/9/2010 6:02 PM
Quote
DarkKobold
Skilled player (1651)
Joined: 11/15/2004
Posts: 2202
Location: Killjoy
Arcade TASer of 2010 PCE TASer of 2010 Arcade TAS of 2010 Lucky TAS of 2009 Lucky TAS of 2007
Mothrayas wrote:
I don't think this is a good idea. Runs in the gruefood are usually not published because they're not good enough for the site. Having an award for them on the site kind of contradicts the purpose of not accepting runs.
Pretty much this.
Sage advice from a friend of Jim: So put your tinfoil hat back in the closet, open your eyes to the truth, and realize that the government is in fact causing austismal cancer with it's 9/11 fluoride vaccinations of your water supply.
Posted: 12/9/2010 6:11 PM
Quote
mmbossman
Experienced player (828)
Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong
GBx TAS of 2008
I would like this idea if it was to crown the absolute worst submission of the year :) But if the intention is to give an award to a movie that was almost good enough to get published, but not quite, then I agree with DK and Mothrayas
Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page
Posted: 12/9/2010 10:58 PM
Quote
rhebus
Joined: 2/19/2010
Posts: 248
Gruefood delight is unofficial (ie not approved by TASvideos as a site, but only by the regulars who maintain it). A gruefood award should be just as unofficial as the gruefood delight itself. alden's post shows how the idea can work well. And since it's unofficial, anyone can do such a list if alden doesn't want to.
Posted: 12/10/2010 11:09 AM
Quote
Warepire
He/Him
Editor
Joined: 3/2/2010
Posts: 2178
Location: A little to the left of nowhere (Sweden)
mmbossman wrote:
I would like this idea if it was to crown the absolute worst submission of the year :) But if the intention is to give an award to a movie that was almost good enough to get published, but not quite, then I agree with DK and Mothrayas
For some reason I kinda like this idea... I vote for the award statue to be a dunce cap, but we would have to exclude the April Fools submissions as it would be unfair if a non-serious submission won the award.
Posted: 12/10/2010 11:18 AM
Quote
Warp
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
rhebus wrote:
Gruefood delight is unofficial (ie not approved by TASvideos as a site, but only by the regulars who maintain it). A gruefood award should be just as unofficial as the gruefood delight itself. alden's post shows how the idea can work well. And since it's unofficial, anyone can do such a list if alden doesn't want to.
Soon we will have unofficial stars (and moons) unofficially awarded to gruefood submissions...
Posted: 12/10/2010 8:55 PM
Quote
sameasusual
Joined: 5/19/2010
Posts: 259
Location: California
Instead of stars, you could give the award a black hole, to show how the submission vanished.
#3201
Posted: 12/10/2010 9:00 PM
Quote
mmbossman
Experienced player (828)
Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong
GBx TAS of 2008
Gold plated dog pile > black hole, imo.
Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page
Posted: 12/11/2010 12:33 PM
Quote
Warp
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
sameasusual wrote:
Instead of stars, you could give the award a black hole, to show how the submission vanished.
Perhaps an icon could be devised from a graphical representation of curved space around a black hole, like: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/upload/2009/11/falling_into_a_black_hole_suck/dec07_1_10.gif