1 2
Posted: 7/8/2007 12:34 AM
Quote
bkDJ
Joined: 7/26/2006
Posts: 1215
"some other movie was published after being in the queue for a week, and it was worse than this, so accept it already" Not a direct quote but some people put out this vibe every once in a while. kind of along the lines of what Nach said.
Posted: 7/8/2007 2:08 PM
Quote
Phil
Active player (411)
Joined: 3/16/2004
Posts: 2623
Location: America, Québec
Another one: "I have followed the progress of this run and I am naturally accepting it."
Posted: 7/8/2007 9:49 PM
Quote
Rridgway
Joined: 2/13/2007
Posts: 448
Location: Calgary, Alberta
A good one this time: Its the first movie of its kind to be published here, why not publish it?
Renting this space for rent. Trying to fix image on this site. Please cut slack. As of April 6th, 2012: After a long absence, here we go again?
Posted: 7/8/2007 9:51 PM
Quote
laughing_gas
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
Rridgway wrote:
A good one this time: Its the first movie of its kind to be published here, why not publish it?
That's the same as this
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Posted: 7/9/2007 4:07 PM
Quote
Truncated
Editor, Reviewer, Experienced player (980)
Joined: 4/17/2004
Posts: 3109
Location: Sweden
Arcade TAS of 2023 Sega TASer of 2021 Sega TAS of 2021
This sounds more like excuses to vote Yes rather than excuses to publish something. Nach> And another: It's been sitting in the queue for so long, we can't just reject it now. That's actually an excellent reason to just reject something.
Posted: 7/9/2007 5:52 PM
Quote
Rridgway
Joined: 2/13/2007
Posts: 448
Location: Calgary, Alberta
This is the players first TAS, we should publish it.
Renting this space for rent. Trying to fix image on this site. Please cut slack. As of April 6th, 2012: After a long absence, here we go again?
Posted: 7/9/2007 8:00 PM
Quote
meepers
Player (35)
Joined: 12/18/2005
Posts: 250
Rridgway wrote:
This is the players first TAS, we should publish it.
Umm.. I don't think that's ever been said before..
我々を待ち受けなさい。
Posted: 7/9/2007 8:01 PM
Quote
LagDotCom
Joined: 3/7/2006
Posts: 720
Location: UK
Yeah, usually the opposite is true.
Voted NO for NO reason
Posted: 7/9/2007 8:11 PM
Quote
Chamale
He/Him
Player (182)
Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada
I saw it earlier today. Rridgway was probably referring to that. Though I forget where exactly it was...
Posted: 7/10/2007 12:21 AM
Quote
Rridgway
Joined: 2/13/2007
Posts: 448
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Yes I was, yes I was. Edit: Fine, I will reword it. Its unusually good for a first TAS, we should publish it.
Renting this space for rent. Trying to fix image on this site. Please cut slack. As of April 6th, 2012: After a long absence, here we go again?
Posted: 7/21/2007 11:12 AM
Quote
Warp
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
"Finally a Pokémon-run of bearable length. Voting a lot of yes."
Posted: 8/25/2008 3:15 AM
Quote
bkDJ
Joined: 7/26/2006
Posts: 1215
http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=176060#176060 and the whole thread in general (N64 Super Smash Bros): People keep submitting this game*, so it should be published. Or: Publish this so people can stop submitting this game. * That means it must be good
1 2