Submission Text Full Submission Page Publication Page
SMB fast run (warp-using ) new record.
The movie length is 4:59.60(17976 frames), from power on to ending the input. When it measures until it took the axe, by having carried out 14frames shortening from the former version, a game is ended within five minutes.
Shortening of a time is aimed at by mainly applying the acceleration power to back in the air.
Much time and effort has been imposed for very slight updating. It shows that Mr. Phil's time is close to a limit.
80% of this movie is made by Editting a file. It is not a thing for showing operation technology.
This movie was made by reference in the play of Phil, and advice of Mana. Thankful to two persons.
(This text was machine-translated English.I'm sorry when unclear.)

Show more

Hide
Posted: 12/16/2004 2:26 PM
Quote
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15610
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #471: pom's NES Super Mario Bros. "warps" in 04:59.60
Posted: 12/16/2004 2:29 PM
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Note: The rerecord count is not really "1". This movie was converted from VirtuaNES using nesmock. The improvement (when comparing the moment of axe hit) is 21 frames (the minimal possible unit), and it ends at first possible moment before the axe is hit. Thank you Pom! Notice to readers: Pom doesn't speak English. If you want to reply him, please verify that a machine-translator can convey your message in an understandable way.
Posted: 12/16/2004 2:33 PM
Quote
Walker_Boh
Former player
Joined: 4/16/2004
Posts: 1276
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
So it got slightly under 5 minutes! Impressive
/Walker Boh
Posted: 12/16/2004 2:53 PM
Post subject: Movie published
Quote
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15610
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [263] NES Super Mario Bros. "warps" by pom in 04:59.60
Posted: 12/16/2004 3:49 PM
Quote
Mazzic
Joined: 8/31/2004
Posts: 298
Location: Falun, Sweden
I did not think this game was improvable at all. Great!
Bein' away for like five years, and not a single new post in the ZSNES forum... :'-(
Posted: 12/16/2004 3:52 PM
Quote
schneelocke
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bisqwit wrote:
Note: The rerecord count is not really "1". This movie was converted from VirtuaNES using nesmock.
What's the actual rerecord count, then? Also, can you download the VirtuaNES version anywhere?
Posted: 12/16/2004 3:54 PM
Quote
Josh_the_FunkDOC
Former player
Joined: 3/13/2004
Posts: 706
Location: Elyria/Oberlin, OH
So the 5-minute barrier has finally been broken, albeit barely...simply beautiful! -Josh
but then you take my 75 perchance chance of winning, if we was to go one-on-one, and then add 66 and two-thirds ch...percents...i got a 141 and two-thirds chance of winning at sacrifice
Posted: 12/16/2004 3:56 PM
(Edited: 1/23/2022 7:09 PM)
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
schneelocke wrote:
What's the actual rerecord count, then? Also, can you download the VirtuaNES version anywhere?
Yes - it is here: https://files.tasvideos.org/bisqwit/smbTApom.zip I don't know the actual rerecord count. nesmock read it as "0".
Posted: 12/16/2004 4:03 PM
Quote
schneelocke
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Thanks! Pity about the rerecord count, though. Ah well.
Posted: 12/16/2004 7:19 PM
Quote
ventuz
He/Him
Player (126)
Joined: 10/4/2004
Posts: 940
frontpage looked like "p o r n" =/ its great, gj.
Posted: 12/16/2004 7:20 PM
Quote
Michael_Fried
Former player
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 1107
I think there was some delay before he pressed start, so that should be fixed.
Posted: 12/16/2004 7:31 PM
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Michael Fried wrote:
I think there was some delay before he pressed start, so that should be fixed.
And if it was to control randomness? The level still starts the same time anyway. Isn't it better if the startup screen is readable for a longer time?
Posted: 12/16/2004 7:44 PM
Quote
Michael_Fried
Former player
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 1107
And if it was to control randomness? The level still starts the same time anyway. Isn't it better if the startup screen is readable for a longer time? Does the 21 frame rule also apply to pressing start at the title screen? If so I didn't know that, but it still looks a little sloppy so you should ask him whether or not it was to control randomness.
Posted: 12/16/2004 8:04 PM
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Yes, it does. Knowing that, I don't see it as a problem. It's nice for the startup screen to be visible for more than 1 frame.
Posted: 12/17/2004 8:13 AM
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Bisqwit wrote:
Yes, it does.
To be clear, it applies to the black screen that comes in between of levels, and yes, also before 1-1.
Posted: 12/17/2004 9:10 AM
Quote
Truncated
Editor, Reviewer, Experienced player (980)
Joined: 4/17/2004
Posts: 3109
Location: Sweden
Arcade TAS of 2023 Sega TASer of 2021 Sega TAS of 2021
Is there a minimum amount of time improvement that a movie must have in order to be published? I thought it was 1 second, rounded, but this proved me wrong.
Posted: 12/17/2004 9:11 AM
Quote
Bisqwit
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
It depends on the precision, movie length, intention, entertainment and other vague factors.
Posted: 12/17/2004 1:44 PM
Quote
nesrocks
He/Him
Player (247)
Joined: 5/1/2004
Posts: 4096
Location: Rio, Brazil
is smb1 case, he broke the 5 mins barrier which was a nice thing
aka Nesrocks http://www.youtube.com/user/UoBtExFODA https://nesrocks.com https://twitter.com/bitinkstudios
Posted: 12/17/2004 8:10 PM
Quote
BoltR
Former player
Joined: 8/12/2004
Posts: 651
Location: Alberta, Canada
FODA has a point, but SMB has got to the point that ANY improvement would probably be accepted...even if it was by less than 10 frames...
Posted: 12/17/2004 8:41 PM
Quote
schneelocke
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Not to mention that in the SMB1 case, any further improvement will probably feature some new tricks, which will also make it worth publishing even if the actual difference in time is not really noticeable.
Posted: 2/24/2010 4:00 PM
Quote
Mitjitsu
He/Him
Banned User
Joined: 4/24/2006
Posts: 2997
TAS of 2007 N64 TAS of 2007
Why are people pointlessly reviving ancient submissions?
Posted: 2/24/2010 4:06 PM
Quote
sgrunt
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Former player
Joined: 10/28/2007
Posts: 1360
Location: The dark horror in the back of your mind
It's mostly the grue at this point, actually, and that's because there have been edits made to the submission text for one reason or another (over the past couple of days this has been largely to remove links to now-dead pages).
Posted: 10/9/2011 5:32 PM
Quote
The_Mario_with_Famtasia
Joined: 3/10/2011
Posts: 136
Location: Inside the FCEUX emulator
Uploaded the AVI to Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JetqmlPqFWs
Blah Blah Blah... Why I'm writing this?