This video is currently being processed. Please check back in a few minutes.
NOOOOOOOOOO! WANT MAH BABBY MOSES NAOOOOOOOOOOO!
Edit: Yay! This was seriously great. I totally pretended that I could tell how much better optimized the general play was, and the level 4 trick was amazing. Seven yes votes.
A warb degombs the brangy. Your gitch zanks and leils the warb.
Moderator, Senior Ambassador, Skilled player
(1006)
Joined: 9/14/2008
Posts: 1014
NitroGenesis wrote:
U can half ur Babby Moses nao. Teh vidz dun prosesin.
Nice, thanks! The walking on (under?) water bit was interesting. So now the question is can anything else be done to get this below 2 minutes? :)
A.C.
******
Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 2227
Location: Georgia, USA
Very nice! I like the pickup of the baby in stages 3 and 4. However, there's just one small problem:
This is supposed to be the story of Moses, not Jesus. Moses is known for parting the sea, not walking on it!
Yes vote.
Used to be a frequent submissions commenter. My new computer has had some issues running emulators, so I've been here more sporadically.
Still haven't gotten around to actually TASing yet... I was going to improve Kid Dracula for GB. It seems I was beaten to it, though, with a recent awesome run by Hetfield90 and StarvinStruthers. (http://tasvideos.org/2928M.html.)
Thanks to goofydylan8 for running Gargoyle's Quest 2 because I mentioned the game! (http://tasvideos.org/2001M.html)
Thanks to feos and MESHUGGAH for taking up runs of Duck Tales 2 because of my old signature!
Thanks also to Samsara for finishing a Treasure Master run. From the submission comments:
Shoutouts and thanks to mklip2001 for arguably being the nicest and most supportive person on the forums.
If I could vote anymore, it would be "No" for the same reason I wrote on Aqfaq's submission wall. Poor, poor game choice. It's much better suited for a regular speedrun, and it's wholly unentertaining.
And just like I said before, I might consider thinking about it if you TASed the whole game and not just this one crappy minigame.
If at first you don't succeed, load your savestate and try again
Joined: 10/28/2007
Posts: 1360
Location: The dark horror in the back of your mind
Wait, we have another submission of this now?
Great. The last thing we need is framewarring over lousy games again. (Raise your hand if Battle Chess causes you fear...)
My [post 274841]earlier reasoning[/post] applies, and I vote no.
Weird, my previous post disappeared for no reason, there might be a problem with the database.
However, I voted yes because I liked the improvement over the other movie, since the new trick is quite cool, and this submission looks definitely more optimised.
Walking underwater upgraded my vote from no to meh.
Sage advice from a friend of Jim: So put your tinfoil hat back in the closet, open your eyes to the truth, and realize that the government is in fact causing austismal cancer with it's 9/11 fluoride vaccinations of your water supply.
I'm going to be very disappointed if we don't have about 8 more submissions of this game. Ideally it can approach SM64 levels of optimization. I think that'd be a good way to spend our time.
Yes vote again for Moses' mother getting all New Testament and having more faith than Peter.
I agree that this game is pretty basic and not very interesting to run, but it is short enough that I can enjoy it, if only for the laughs. It's a shame we don't have a "lols" category for submissions... but I guess if we can't publish colored dinosaurs, this will go down in like form.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
I couldn't finish watching this.
Even 2 minutes seem too long.
NO for the game choice.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
IMO this movie is more interesting than many other published runs. (It certainly helps that it's short.) I really don't understand what people are complaining about. I voted yes.
Joined: 4/21/2004
Posts: 3517
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
This does not look like a tas, pretty bad game choice and therefore I have to vote no.
Nitrogenesis wrote:
Guys I come from the DidyKnogRacist communite, and you are all wrong, tihs is the run of the mileniun and everyone who says otherwise dosnt know any bater! I found this run vary ease to masturbate too!!!! Don't fuck with me, I know this game so that mean I'm always right!StupedfackincommunityTASVideoz!!!!!!
Arc wrote:
I enjoyed this movie in which hands firmly gripping a shaft lead to balls deep in multiple holes.
natt wrote:
I don't want to get involved in this discussion, but as a point of fact C# is literally the first goddamn thing on that fucking page you linked did you even fucking read it
Cooljay wrote:
Mayor Haggar and Cody are such nice people for the community. Metro City's hospitals reached an all time new record of incoming patients due to their great efforts :P
Joined: 7/29/2004
Posts: 136
Location: Temple City, CA
Well, I was actually extremely amused for this. Not sure I could take more than 4 or 5 minutes of it, but at 2 minutes, it feels great. This gets a yes vote from me.
"How can you prove you exist? Maybe we don't exist..."
-Vivi Ornitier (Final Fantasy IX)
I'm curious to know what your argumentation is.
The gameplay is fluid and flawless, there are many close calls and at least one glitch exploitation. Looks like a quite typical TAS to me.
Granted, it might be that with enough practice someone could achieve something close to this via regular play. However, that's no excuse to reject the TAS. Note that for example the unassisted record of SMB is just a few seconds longer than the TAS (which is a minuscule amount when the run is 5 minutes long). Yet that's not grounds for rejection.
I'm sure that with a bit of work we could find at least a few other published runs which are similar to this (besides SMB, of course).
Voting yes because the game is terrible is the same as voting no because the game is terrible. Who cares about the game? Rate the video.
This TAS, while executed well, isn't that fun to watch. Given the style of gameplay it's probably about as good as it'll ever get though. Meh vote.
