Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
jlun2 wrote:
You should use FCEUX instead, as the format, .fm2, is a text file; allowing easy edits, in case you found a trick at the very beginning of the run.
FCEUX's TAS Editor helps much more as you can see the result of your changes on fly.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Toothache wrote:
Encode in progress
Will you use my flicker algorithm? I can make HD since I ran my 3rd account XD
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
I'd love you to continue this this game TAS. I just don't imagine how interesting could those further long levels look. I got bored playing them in real time. The beginning looks fine.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
So you are basically saying that human feelings are more trustworthy than physical observation, measurement and testing.
I just didn't mention how insane work shall be put to become able to feel the right and wrong. This is the subject of one's pure interst - what to achieve from himself. I'm not into true sciense, so I can't argue objectively.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
I love how you twist my words. Is it lazyness to adhere to my own decisions in the face of the whole world and people around, convincing me how to act or speak? It's checking how right they are, if you remember, I said I keep 'tasing', improving my self all the time. And the 'answer' is always being improved, deepened and sometimes even disproved.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
This thread is turning into Ask feos. The only reason why we think differently is that we are actually different persons. And no person can say he knows all. I just described the stuff confirmed for me during my life (no need to describe how, particularly). It never confirmed for you so you see no reason to TRUST me in that. No, I took nothing by faith, I analized everything I've read and what seemed strange to me. Do you want me to write the whole dump of my mind? Hehe.
This approach is not constructive. If people relied on the first and foremost assumption popping in their head (rather than applying critical thinking and searching for objective truth), we would still live in caves (okay, in monastic cells if you think there was no lithic age).
It's not about catching the first thought coming to your mind. It's about actual searching for the answer. Analizing. One just needs to stay true to himself & beware of narcissism. Getting a higher answer isn't harder than getting one for any real life subject.
You mean they were hearing voices?
You never heard your inner voice that advised you what's better to do or say, right? Oh, and surely, there's no reality that can't be seen or touched or measured otherwise :P
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
moozooh wrote:
I hope you aren't going to argue that the Bible was written by God himself. It was written by men; it think that's obvious enough. By taking it literally you put your faith in those men first and God second.
LOL, if you write down the words I dictate you (as some writers used to do, their helpers wrote down what they were speaking), are you something that can divide me from the reader? I trust God who said that I can trust those men and confirmed their witnessing differently (for me).
AnS wrote:
So you're afraid that god will get pissed and send you to hell because you applied critical thinking to something written in a book that might or might not be "the manual"?
Manual says Megaman can't walk on spikes. But "science" applied critical thinking and whoa.
I afraid of nothing because I can feel the truth, by intuition. And I feel what is right for me and what's wrong. As for critical thinking, I mentioned that God is Absolute and free of flaws withing his creation, while human really can find bugs in any program because they were all written by a human. So the only constructive approach is to WONDER what the given part means, looking for the answer that would make you feel it's right. And your destiny would kindly send you such an answer. Happened to me hundreds of times, in different spheres.
But there's something that's higher than any written text. It's your own heart's direct feeling. Conscience, intuition. It leads you where no text can give an acceptable answer. And the most funny thing is when your heart allows you the things forbidden by the text (crux death was damned in the Old Testament).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
That if you take figuratively the thing that wasn't intended for that by the Author, you can still "go to Heaven". You imagine yourself a measure of what shall be literally trusted in the Bible and what not.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Wrong assumption. What CAN'T be taken literally in the Bible (like Matthew 19:12: "there are eunuchs who have made themselves so for the sake of the kingdom of Heaven") and what CAN is determined by God himself (thanks to saints who have written or told all important Bible books interpretations), not by something that never can be blindly trusted (I explained earlier why you can't trust science totally).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
After Darwin and the dissemination of evolutionism, it became scientific to disprove Bible, the new philosophy was born and captured scientists' minds as well. Are scientists cold-minded robots? No. They get influenced by the common philosophic attitude of their times.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
I was saying that figurative conception of that day is wrong. Nothing prevents us from thinking those few days lasted longer or shorter than ours (except the nowadays paradigma, based on atheism).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
They are basically proposing that God created the universe about 6000 years ago and then went to extreme lengths to make it look like it's much, much older. For what purpose?
Did anyone say why Adam was created as a mature man? Simply because that was good in God's eyes. The same is with the rest things. Everything was created mature, but there's still a process of birth for the newer things.
And talking about the word 'day', if you accept that those days weren't just one dark part and one bright part and that's it, if you think that those days lasted for millions of days each (which isn't what the Bible says already), then you come up with the idea of DEATH, that existed until everything got evoluted from everything and has been promoting the evolution process itself. While we know that death appeared only at the end of that God's week.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Well, let's imagine I'm the creator of something. I'm writing a manual of how to work with the thing I've developed. I can deliver the source code, if you ask me and I find you grounded enough to understand all correctly.
But instead of just direct asking you keep reverse engineering my product. Can you pretend on exhaustive knowledge that way? The funny thing is that after you restore a piece of the original code, you see that it contradicts the manual. And you tell me that I have a mistake in my docs, proving it with your hard debugging work.
What can I say in that case? You just aren't familiar enough with the structure of my produce. Is that the fault of my manual?
Now we shall add that God's product is infinite in details, because he foresaw all possible situations, like a perfect game developer. And what's the result of a clever game development? A perfect game, that can both entertain and rear you. You shall put enough diligence to win, and the reward overcomes all your expectations.
You can reverse engineer the real life for all your life and not advance at all, comparing to the whole diversity of the universe.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Science doesn't afraid of mistakes. That means it shall be not just trusted, but checked and proved everytime. This also means that science can't study the Absolute. All knowledges are relative, they either deepen during the years, or get disproved. This is an endless process, like cutting the atom apart until we get a hypothetical indivisible particle.
While Bible accounts all possible info, and I can't even imagine, what part of it is known. You know, any number is infinitely smaller than infinity. So, you can't trust that science TOO much.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Warp wrote:
Taking the Genesis story completely literally is problematic because it contradicts almost everything that is known as, for all intents and purposes, facts by science.
That's just the problem of science. The current paradigma sucks hard.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Bisqwit, we shall try rerecording and tools toward our real life, to get better luck by manipulation. Because YT timelimit seems to depend on some weird RNG. Who ever wanted to reverse engineer his life?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
My second channel was capped too, but it detects NO copyrighted stuff!
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
Encoding HD. I hope the result video is below 15 minutes.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
I said that just to use the image once more.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
scrimpeh wrote:
Screencap'd for Validity:
This looks shopped.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
You didn't notice that in the second bonus?
EDIT: what's the profit of this Shield: when you get a hit, you don't have the damage animation that takes time. So you really can take damage not wasting time while with the Shield. The rest of bonus stuff is useless timewise.
EDIT 2: For those who didn't see that video
Link to video
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
sack_bot wrote:
i see some improvements but ill give you a "yes"
like failing at the bonus levels to save time
and not saying how
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Site Admin, Skilled player
(1238)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11287
Location: RU
nfq wrote:
I don't know anything about programming, but with your skills, wouldn't it be easy to make the PS2 TAS emulator so that it doesn't desync?
If a Higher Voice tells him to, sure.
Edit: Or did you ask about the possibility itself, regardless Bisqwit?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
EDIT: what's the profit of this Shield: when you get a hit, you don't have the damage animation that takes time. So you really can take damage not wasting time while with the Shield. The rest of bonus stuff is useless timewise.
EDIT 2: For those who didn't see that video
Link to video
